Torque on a circular current loop

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the torque on a circular current loop, specifically why it can be expressed as τ = I A × B. Participants explore the derivation starting from the Lorentz force, emphasizing the breakdown of the loop into smaller rectangular segments to analyze their contributions to torque. The total torque is derived by summing the individual torques from these segments, leading to the conclusion that the formula holds true even for circular loops. The conversation highlights the mathematical reasoning behind the formula and the simplification of complex integrals. Overall, the insights shared clarify the intuition behind the torque equation for circular current loops.
Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
This is a conceptual question.
Relevant Equations
$$ \vec{\tau}=I \vec{A} \times \vec{B} $$
Can anyone please tell me why the torque on a circular current loop can be calculated by the equation below? In other words, what is the intuition for the formula? Thank you. (I modified my question to a particular case)
$$ \vec{\tau} = I \vec{A} \times \vec{B} $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Try to figure it out starting from the Lorentz force
Hi. I have updated my question. I have not learned vector calculus since I am in high school and this is how far I can go.

$$d\vec{F} = I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B}$$
$$\vec{r} \times d\vec{F} = \vec{r} \times (I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B})$$
$$d\tau = \vec{r} \times (I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B})$$
$$\int d\tau = \int ((\vec{r} \times I d\vec{L}) \times \vec{B})$$
$$\int d\tau = \int rI d(L\hat{n} \times \vec{B})$$
 
haruspex said:
Thanks, but I do understand the case in which the wire is rectangular. I would like to know why the formula is still valid when the loop is circular
InkedInkedLoop_LI.jpg
.
 
Go back to the Lorentz force and do the calculation.

Hey, didn't I reply something similar earlier on ?
 
Actually the torque is ##\vec r \times \vec F~\rightarrow~\vec \tau = \int \vec r \times I (d\vec L \times \vec B)=I\int \vec r \times (d\vec L \times \vec B)##. The question of an arbitrary shaped current loop is normally treated in an intermediate-level EM textbok. I will not reproduce the solution here in favor of a hand-waving argument that might satisfy you because it is a description of the mathematical argument that adds and subtracts a whole bunch of zeroes.

Suppose you subdivide an arbitrary shaped loop carrying current ##I## into many infinitesimally small rectangular loops that fill the area of the original loop. Each of these loops carries current ##I## determined by the a right hand rule consistent with the normal ##\hat n## to the loop. The ##i##th loop contributes torque ##d\vec \tau_i=d\vec m_i \times \vec B=I dA_i~\hat n \times \vec B##. Adding all such contributions gives the total torque ##\vec \tau=I A~\hat n \times \vec B##.

Note that any rectangular loop that has a common boundary with another loop can be combined into a larger loop because current in the common boundary runs in opposite directions and therefore has no contribution to the net force or the net torque. The contribution to the torque of both loops together would be ##d\vec \tau_{i,i+1}=d\vec m_{i,i+1} \times \vec B=I (dA_i+dA_{i+1})~\hat n \times \vec B## and so on until one runs out of neighboring loops having reached the boundary.

Thus the internal common boundaries can be ignored and what's left is the outside boundary of the arbitrary loop that contributes to the total torque and that has already been found.
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes Leo Liu and etotheipi
kuruman said:
Note that any rectangular loop that has a common boundary with another loop can be combined into a larger loop because current in the common boundary runs in opposite directions and therefore has no contribution to the net force or the net torque. The contribution to the torque of both loops together would be ##d\vec \tau_{i,i+1}=d\vec m_{i,i+1} \times \vec B=I (dA_i+dA_{i+1})~\hat n \times \vec B## and so on until one runs out of neighboring loops having reached the boundary.

Thus the internal common boundaries can be ignored and what's left is the outside boundary of the arbitrary loop that contributes to the total torque and that has already been found.

Wow, that's such a cool approach! I've been messing around with horrible integrals and this is much nicer!
 
kuruman said:
Suppose you subdivide an arbitrary shaped loop carrying current ##I## into many infinitesimally small rectangular loops that fill the area of the original loop. Each of these loops carries current ##I## determined by the a right hand rule consistent with the normal ##\hat n## to the loop. The ##i##th loop contributes torque ##d\vec \tau_i=d\vec m_i \times \vec B=I dA_i~\hat n \times \vec B##. Adding all such contributions gives the total torque ##\vec \tau=I A~\hat n \times \vec B##.
I love your insight! Thank you for your answer!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
775
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K