Torque on a circular current loop

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the torque on a circular current loop, specifically the formula $$ \vec{\tau} = I \vec{A} \times \vec{B} $$ and the intuition behind it. Participants are exploring the underlying concepts of torque in the context of electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the torque formula starting from the Lorentz force and considering the contributions from infinitesimally small segments of the loop. There are questions about the validity of the formula for circular loops compared to rectangular ones.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the derivation of the torque from the Lorentz force and have discussed the contributions from subdividing the loop into smaller segments. There is a recognition of different approaches being explored, and some participants express appreciation for the insights shared.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes their current level of understanding, indicating they have not yet learned vector calculus, which may limit their ability to engage with the mathematical aspects of the discussion fully.

Leo Liu
Messages
353
Reaction score
156
Homework Statement
This is a conceptual question.
Relevant Equations
$$ \vec{\tau}=I \vec{A} \times \vec{B} $$
Can anyone please tell me why the torque on a circular current loop can be calculated by the equation below? In other words, what is the intuition for the formula? Thank you. (I modified my question to a particular case)
$$ \vec{\tau} = I \vec{A} \times \vec{B} $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
BvU said:
Try to figure it out starting from the Lorentz force
Hi. I have updated my question. I have not learned vector calculus since I am in high school and this is how far I can go.

$$d\vec{F} = I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B}$$
$$\vec{r} \times d\vec{F} = \vec{r} \times (I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B})$$
$$d\tau = \vec{r} \times (I d\vec{L} \times \vec{B})$$
$$\int d\tau = \int ((\vec{r} \times I d\vec{L}) \times \vec{B})$$
$$\int d\tau = \int rI d(L\hat{n} \times \vec{B})$$
 
haruspex said:
Thanks, but I do understand the case in which the wire is rectangular. I would like to know why the formula is still valid when the loop is circular
InkedInkedLoop_LI.jpg
.
 
Go back to the Lorentz force and do the calculation.

Hey, didn't I reply something similar earlier on ?
 
Actually the torque is ##\vec r \times \vec F~\rightarrow~\vec \tau = \int \vec r \times I (d\vec L \times \vec B)=I\int \vec r \times (d\vec L \times \vec B)##. The question of an arbitrary shaped current loop is normally treated in an intermediate-level EM textbok. I will not reproduce the solution here in favor of a hand-waving argument that might satisfy you because it is a description of the mathematical argument that adds and subtracts a whole bunch of zeroes.

Suppose you subdivide an arbitrary shaped loop carrying current ##I## into many infinitesimally small rectangular loops that fill the area of the original loop. Each of these loops carries current ##I## determined by the a right hand rule consistent with the normal ##\hat n## to the loop. The ##i##th loop contributes torque ##d\vec \tau_i=d\vec m_i \times \vec B=I dA_i~\hat n \times \vec B##. Adding all such contributions gives the total torque ##\vec \tau=I A~\hat n \times \vec B##.

Note that any rectangular loop that has a common boundary with another loop can be combined into a larger loop because current in the common boundary runs in opposite directions and therefore has no contribution to the net force or the net torque. The contribution to the torque of both loops together would be ##d\vec \tau_{i,i+1}=d\vec m_{i,i+1} \times \vec B=I (dA_i+dA_{i+1})~\hat n \times \vec B## and so on until one runs out of neighboring loops having reached the boundary.

Thus the internal common boundaries can be ignored and what's left is the outside boundary of the arbitrary loop that contributes to the total torque and that has already been found.
 
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Leo Liu and etotheipi
kuruman said:
Note that any rectangular loop that has a common boundary with another loop can be combined into a larger loop because current in the common boundary runs in opposite directions and therefore has no contribution to the net force or the net torque. The contribution to the torque of both loops together would be ##d\vec \tau_{i,i+1}=d\vec m_{i,i+1} \times \vec B=I (dA_i+dA_{i+1})~\hat n \times \vec B## and so on until one runs out of neighboring loops having reached the boundary.

Thus the internal common boundaries can be ignored and what's left is the outside boundary of the arbitrary loop that contributes to the total torque and that has already been found.

Wow, that's such a cool approach! I've been messing around with horrible integrals and this is much nicer!
 
kuruman said:
Suppose you subdivide an arbitrary shaped loop carrying current ##I## into many infinitesimally small rectangular loops that fill the area of the original loop. Each of these loops carries current ##I## determined by the a right hand rule consistent with the normal ##\hat n## to the loop. The ##i##th loop contributes torque ##d\vec \tau_i=d\vec m_i \times \vec B=I dA_i~\hat n \times \vec B##. Adding all such contributions gives the total torque ##\vec \tau=I A~\hat n \times \vec B##.
I love your insight! Thank you for your answer!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K