Torque Required to bring a drum to rest

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a goods lift system with a cage and a winding drum, where the original poster seeks to determine the braking torque required to bring the system to rest within a specified time frame. The context includes considerations of gravitational forces and energy transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate various parameters, including inertia, angular acceleration, and energy contributions from different components of the system. Some participants question the validity of the stopping distance and the contributions of potential energy to the braking torque.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problem, including energy considerations and force analysis. There is an ongoing dialogue about the assumptions made regarding the height and energy contributions, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of missing information, such as the mass of the drum, and the original poster's calculations for stopping distance are under scrutiny. The discussion also highlights the need to consider gravitational potential energy in the context of braking torque.

teage
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a problem involving a goods lift with a cage m1 = 1500kg which is raised at V = 4m/s via a winding drum with a radius of 0.6m with the help of a counter weight of m = 900kg. i am asked to find the braking torque required to bring it to rest in 1 1/3 seconds. Also i am to consider gravity playing its part.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have calculated a few things that i thought i would need

inertia of the drum = 95 kg.m^2.
angular acceleration = -5 rad/sec^2
angular velocity= 6 2/3 rad/sec
linear distance to stop = 8m

My idea was to add the kinetic energy of m1, The drum and the potential energy of m2 together to get a total energy so i could use T= E/theta. But then i realized that m1 would contribute to the braking force.
i have attached an image of what i am working with. Any assistance or guidance is much appreciated.

Thanks
Kane
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4268.JPG
    IMG_4268.JPG
    69.1 KB · Views: 542
  • IMG_4268.JPG
    IMG_4268.JPG
    69.1 KB · Views: 497
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry about the image being 90 degrees off optimal! it was the right way when i viewed it earlier.
 
I don't get 8m to stop. Did you miss something out?
You don't state a mass for the drum, so where does the 95kg m2 come from?
Working entirely with energy should be ok. I see no mention of the change in PE of m1.
If the braking torque is ##\tau##, what work will it do in the stopping distance?
(The two pages you posted are identical. Should they be different?)
 
haruspex said:
I don't get 8m to stop. Did you miss something out?
You don't state a mass for the drum, so where does the 95kg m2 come from?
Working entirely with energy should be ok. I see no mention of the change in PE of m1.
If the braking torque is ##\tau##, what work will it do in the stopping distance?
(The two pages you posted are identical. Should they be different?)

Thanks for the input, the drum inertia was a given and the 8m is what i was using for potential energy(using kinematic equations solving for theta). Do i use the distance to stop when calculating the potential energies?

I've tried again this morning using a different method

method

calculate the tension forces in each side and find the torque required my multiplying the total force by the radius.I tried again with the energy method. I've left out potential energies because they don't seem to contribute towards the braking torque, or do they? I've attached pictures of both, with very different results. where am i going wrong?

Thanks

Kane
 

Attachments

  • PF2.JPG
    PF2.JPG
    62.2 KB · Views: 454
sorry, second pic is here..i'm having no luck with uploads here.. please excuse that
 

Attachments

  • PF1.JPG
    PF1.JPG
    55.4 KB · Views: 508
I forgot to mention: please do not post working as images, especially if you don't seem to be able to get them to appear right way up!
You still have not explained how you get 8m. Please post your working for that.
And yes, you do need to consider gravitational PE. Why do you think gravity doesn't affect the braking torque?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: teage
haruspex said:
I forgot to mention: please do not post working as images, especially if you don't seem to be able to get them to appear right way up!
You still have not explained how you get 8m. Please post your working for that.
And yes, you do need to consider gravitational PE. Why do you think gravity doesn't affect the braking torque?

s=ut+(1/2)at^2

u= 4m/s; t= 1 1/3s; a=3/ms^2

s=8m

For m1, it is traveling vertically upward, contributing to the braking torque. i don't understand how the height that it is at effects the force it contributes to braking. or which height to use. The only height i have is the stopping distance. Also i don't think the kinetic energy would contribute anything, considering it is going up and slowing down.

For m2 the force of tension takes into account mg and ma, so i don't know what i am missing there. I think the kinetic energy for this mass plays a big role. i just don't know how to apply the concept.

Thanks for taking the time!
 
teage said:
u= 4m/s; t= 1 1/3s; a=3/ms^2
It's getting faster while braking?!
teage said:
don't understand how the height that it is at effects the force it contributes to braking.
The height doesn't affect the force, but you're mixing up the energy view with the force view.
In the force view, the gravitational force affects the braking force needed.
In the energy view, the change in height affects the quantity of energy the braking has to dispose of.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K