Engineering Total Lateral Stiffness from Stiffness Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tygra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Moment
Click For Summary
To compute the total static stiffness of a Moment Resisting Frame, the stiffness matrix has been established using the direct stiffness method, but further steps are needed to derive the total stiffness. The stiffness matrix provided includes terms based on the modulus of elasticity, second moment of area, frame width, and height. The user is referencing a book, "Dynamics of Structures," for guidance but is struggling with the application of the concepts. Assistance is requested to clarify the process for calculating total stiffness from the stiffness matrix. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurate structural analysis and design.
Tygra
Messages
55
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
How to use a stiffness method matrix to find total stiffness
Relevant Equations
See in post
Hi all,

I am working on the following Moment Resisting Frame:

portal frame.png

The frame has the following structural properties:

Matlab:
E = 2.1E+08   % Modulus of elasticity;
I = 0.000117  % Second moment of area
L = 5;   % Frame width
h = 3;  % Frame height

I want to compute the total static stiffness of the frame. I have calculated the stiffness matrix for this frame using the direct stiffness method, but that does not give you the total stiffness.

Here is the stiffness matrix K

Matlab:
K =    [24*E*I/h^3 6*E*I/h^2 6*E*I/h^2;
       6*E*I/h^2 (4*E*I/h + 4*E*I/L) 2*E*I/L;
       6*E*I/h^2 2*E*I/L (4*E*I/h + 4*E*I/L)]

I am following this book (Dynamics of Structures) that shows you how to do it, but I don't quite get it.

book.png



Could someone help me please?

Many thanks,

Tygra
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
660
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
490
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K