Total load using step-up transformer

  • Thread starter Thread starter TKarlsson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Transformer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the load on a UPS when using a step-up transformer to transmit power over a distance of 3.5 km. The scenario involves stepping up 400Vac to 1000Vac and then stepping it down again at the load, with considerations for transformer efficiency, line losses, and load characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the calculation of the UPS load given a communication module that draws 5 amps and is located 3.5 km away.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of knowing transformer efficiency and power factor, noting that transformers are not 100% efficient and that power losses must be accounted for.
  • A different participant mentions the energy loss in the 3.5 km conductors, suggesting that the efficiency of transformers is around 98% when near full load.
  • One participant provides specific details about the setup, including transformer ratings and cable specifications, and seeks confirmation on whether the UPS can handle the load without exceeding its capacity.
  • Another participant calculates the resistance of the aluminum cable and estimates the power loss and voltage drop, questioning the necessity of voltage stepping given the low losses.
  • One participant asserts that the load on the UPS in VA will be approximately the same as the load at the remote end, highlighting the role of inefficiency and line resistance in the calculations.
  • A suggestion is made to consider placing the UPS at the load end instead, as it may be more practical and reduce vulnerability in the power supply chain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of voltage stepping and the implications for UPS load calculations. There is no consensus on the optimal setup or the necessity of the step-up transformer given the specific cable characteristics and load requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions, such as transformer efficiency and the characteristics of the transmission cable, which may affect the accuracy of the load calculations. The discussion does not resolve these assumptions or provide definitive calculations.

TKarlsson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all.
I'm hoping someone can help me out on a (for me) tricky little issue.
We are to use a communication module that we know will draw 5amp and must be supplied via a UPS. Tricky bit is that its 3.5km away so we need to step up the voltage at source and step down again at load. 400Vac is to be stepped up to 1000Vac (50Hz) and back down again at load. And now to the question, how do I calculate the load on the UPS with this setup?
Grateful for help.
Regards
Tony
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You would need to know how efficient the transformers are and the power factor of the load.

Each transformer will need more power going into it than is coming out due to it not being 100 % efficient.

So, you add up these power losses and add it to the input power of the whole setup.

Then the UPS has to supply this power.
 
in above add energy loss in 3.5km conductors, which will depend on load current. Transformers is a very efficient electrical machine with efficiency ~98% if operated near full load
 
Gents.
Thanks very much for your replies. All this ends up well above my head so I was hoping you could give me rough idea of what my load on UPS would be with the following setup.

Step-up Tx: 230Vac to 1000Vac, rated 5kVA >98% efficiency.
~3000m of aluminium cable with 70mm2 cores.
Step-down Tx: 1000Vac to 230Vac, rated 5kVA.
Load of 5amp at pf~0.97

I only really need to confirm that our UPS is man for the job, before installing this setup we still have about 5000W left (and still leaving 20% of full capacity spare).
So question is really, will this draw more than 5000W (roughly) and definitely no more than 8000W.

I'd be very grateful for your information gents.

Regards
Tony
 
Aluminium has resistivity of 28.2 nΩ·m.
So, L = 3000, A = 70 mm2 will have total resistance of just R = 1.2Ω. Even without voltage stepping only 5A will flow. For a 5 A ampere current the loss is just around 25 watts and voltage drop is a mere 6 volts; quite small for such a length.
So, I don't see the need of voltage stepping at all if you are going to use 70 mm2 aluminium wire.

If you are anyway going to use voltage stepping, then I don't see the need to use 70 mm2 wire.
 
Last edited:
--Sorry, multiple posts. Deleted--
-- See above post ---
 
Last edited:
It may need to be pointed out that, essentially, the load on the UPS (in VA) will be about the same as the VA used at the other end, irrespective of the step up and step down. There is only the issue of inefficiency and line resistance to take into account.
The point of the step up step down is that the transmitted current will be less. In this case, the the transmitted current is reduced by a factor of 1/(voltage ratio) compared with the current taken by the remote equipment. Presumably someone did a sum, using the known resistance of the transmission cable, which indicated the need to transmit at 2.5 times the supply volts to reduce the effect of series resistance loss in the cable.
Without knowing the actual gauge of the transmission cable, you can't calculate the actual losses but you may be able to rely on the fact that the high voltage transmission system will be 'adequate' so that you can work on the assumption that Power Out = Power In and then give yourself a 20% overhead. In any case, it's not a heavy load (only 2kW) so a UPS to cover a bit of margin shouldn't cost an arm and a leg.
Mightn't it be better to put the UPS at the far end, in any case? (If it's at all practicable) The supply line could well be the most vulnerable part of the power supply chain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K