Total potential difference of an electron

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference for an electron starting from rest near a fixed negative charge. The formula used is V = k*Q/R, resulting in a negative potential difference of -1.63*10^3 V. However, the platform accepted a positive value, leading to confusion about whether answers should always be positive. Clarification indicates that the problem asks for the magnitude of potential difference, which is typically expressed as a positive value. The conversation highlights the importance of interpreting the wording of physics problems accurately.
Dancing_Queen
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So this is the problem that I got on LonCapa:

1. An electron starts from rest 66.1 cm from a fixed point charge with Q=-0.120 μC. What total potential difference accelerates the electron from being very far away from Q?

I understand the equation that I have to use, which is V=k*Q/R. I plugged everything in like this:
V=[(9.0*109 N*m2/C2)*(-0.120*10-6 C)]/(0.661 m)
V=-1.63*103 V

When I was plugging my answer into LonCapa, it said it was wrong, so I changed the sign from a negative to a positive and it accepted that. I was wondering if someone could explain why that is to me. Are all answers supposed to be positive?

[Mentors Note: Thread moved from General Physics]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find the wording strange. What does it mean to accelerate the electron "from being very far away"? Is that the exact wording? A translation perhaps?
Maybe it doesn't matter. It asks for a potential difference. Unless the wording that puzzles me is supposed to indicate it somehow, there's no specification as to which way the difference should be taken. That being so, it just wants a magnitude, which would generally mean a positive value.
 
Nope, this is the exact wording (although I agree it's kind of weird)! Here is what the problem looks like on LonCapa: http://i.imgur.com/FOrbThj.jpg

I guess it's pretty obvious now when I think about it. :D
I just wasn't sure if there was something I was missing or doing wrong. Thank you!
 
There is a slight difference between "from far away" and "to far away" :smile:

The answer you gave is more correct than the accepted answer:

##V = {k Q\over R}## is negative at the outset and zero "far away". The unit is Volt = Joules per Coulomb.

The electron (with a negative charge) has a positive energy ##E_{\rm electric field} = q V ## in the beginning and that gets converted into a positive kinetic energy "far away".
 
BvU, I didn't even catch that, thanks! :smile:
 
BvU said:
There is a slight difference between "from far away" and "to far away" :smile:

The answer you gave is more correct than the accepted answer:

##V = {k Q\over R}## is negative at the outset and zero "far away". The unit is Volt = Joules per Coulomb.

The electron (with a negative charge) has a positive energy ##E_{\rm electric field} = q V ## in the beginning and that gets converted into a positive kinetic energy "far away".
Given the revised wording, I agree. The answer is negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top