Total spin angular momentum meaning

galvin452
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Two questions

1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1). What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
galvin452 said:
Two questions
2) Similarly for the electron the total spin angular momentum is given as S2-1/2(1/2+1) hbar2. Is the total angular momentum precessing to give sz 1/2 hbar object?

Or is it that the electron has two intrinsic spin values?
 
galvin452 said:
1) The total orbital spin angular momentum is given as L2=l(l+1).

There's no such thing as "total orbital spin angular momentum."

Orbital angular momentum has magnitude ##L = \sqrt{l(l+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##L_z = m_l \hbar## where ##m_l = -l \cdots +l## in steps of 1.

Spin angular momentum has magnitude ##S = \sqrt{s(s+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##S_z = m_s \hbar## where ##m_s = -s \cdots +s## in steps of 1. For e.g. an electron, s = 1/2, so ms = -1/2 or +1/2.

Total angular momentum has magnitude ##J = \sqrt{j(j+1)} \hbar##, and its component along any direction (usually we use the z-direction) is ##J_z = m_j \hbar## where ##m_j = -j \cdots +j## in steps of 1.

(Some books use different notation.)

What is the source of or meaning of the (l+1).

For orbital angular momentum, one way to get the ##l(l+1)## is to apply the (orbital) angular momentum operator to the solutions to the Schrödinger equation for e.g. the hydrogen atom. There's probably a "deeper" way to get it which applies to all three kinds of angular momentum, but someone else will have to provide it.
 
No that's pretty much it - in QM classes (here anyway) we force students to do that calculation.
The quantum number basically comes from counting the states. There are three dimensions and the surd comes from the vector sum. You actually have to crunch through the equations to see it.

One may expect that the lth L state would have L=l\hbar ... but that neglects stuff like that there are three dimensions. The x(x+1) pattern is kind-of a symmetry in angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top