Calculating Torque for Wheelies: 2009 KTM 690 SMC Bike Gearing Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slidewayz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the torque required for wheelies on a 2009 KTM 690 SMC, the discussion reveals that the bike's weight, center of gravity (CoG), and gearing ratios are crucial. The bike can wheelie at 4,000 RPM, producing approximately 40 lb-ft of torque, but calculations indicate that 62 lb-ft is needed based on the CoG and traction force requirements. The estimated traction force must equal 80% of the bike's weight, translating to about 409 lb-ft of wheel torque, which exceeds the current output. Adjustments to sprockets or increasing power are suggested to achieve a more consistent performance for rolling wheelies. The impact of front fork suspension during acceleration is also noted as a factor in achieving wheelies.
Slidewayz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Its been way too long from my switch from Engg student to biz owner .. can you help me out with this?

If I haven't given enough info below - the bike is a 2009 KTM 690 SMC.

I'm trying to figure out the instantaneous torque required to wheelie my bike in order to develop gearing proper to roll on 2nd/3rd gear wheelies.

In first - it will wheelie after 4k rpm with ease. Bike makes 63hp @ 7500, 47 lb*ft tq @ 5900. At 4k, its around 40 ft lb. With the gearing - 1st gear is 2.5:1, and final drive is 2.625:1. So first gear peak tq is 328 lb ft assuming no drive train losses.

Bike weighs 320lbs, I'm guessing CoG is 24" high. I weigh 180 with gear, my CoG on bike would be about 48" high. So together - roughly 30" high you have 500lbs CoG.
Wheel diameter is 24.56" - so from center of wheel to CoG(total) is 24" across, and 18" higher.

From this can you calculate the req'd tq to wheelie and show me how you did the calculations?
Thanks a bunch!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Looks to me like we need to know horizontal CoG positions for both you and the bike with respect to the rear axle in order to do anything.
 
Check the theory at the bottom of this page. (Look for: Theory --> Longitudinal acceleration --> Accelerating --> Axle load distribution)

Equation 14 from that page can be simplified to (assuming no aerodynamic lift):

\frac{W_{f}}{mg} = \frac{l_r}{L} - \frac{h}{L} \left( \frac{F_t}{mg} - f_r \right)

For a wheelie, \frac{W_{f}}{mg} = 0, so the needed traction force at the tire contact patch (F_{t}) is:

\frac{F_{t}}{mg} = \frac{l_r/L}{h/L} + f_r

Where:

mg is the total vehicle's weight;
l_r/L is the portion of the vehicle's weight on the front axle;
h/L is the CG-height-to-wheelbase ratio;
f_r is the rolling resistance coefficient (may be ignored as well);

In your case (This is basically the equation found in post #13 of this thread):

\frac{F_{t}}{mg} = \frac{l_r}{h} = \frac{24"}{30"} = 0.80

Which means your traction force must be equal to 80% of your bike's weight or 400 lb. With a wheel diameter of 24.56", this means a wheel torque of 409 lb.ft is required or an engine torque of 62 lb.ft (based on your 1st gear ratio). Which is more than your 40 lb.ft you estimated. That may mean that your CG position is not where you think it is (If I didn't make any mistake).
 
Jack,
Thank you sir.

I really was estimating based on visualizing the bike from the side, and estimating my CoG sitting on the seat with feet on the pegs.

Based on the fact that it will wheelie from 4000 rpm, it gives us a 'check' of sorts for your formula to actually be able to estimate the CoG. Now, the one thing that adds to the problem is the front fork suspension - when you accelerate, the forks help "push" up the front wheel, and the rear suspension resists this until a certain point.

At about 4k - the stock dyno figures are showing roughly 60Nm vs the peak 68Nm. So 44 lbft x 2.5(1stG) x 2.625(Final) = 289 lbft at the wheel, assuming no drivetrain loss.

So if I look into changing sprockets, or adding power - I'll use 300 lbft at the wheel as a general wheelie reference for roll on.. of course clutching it up would make it easier - but I don't like the consistency of that.

Big thanks!
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top