Trace of a subsystem of a two qubit system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the density operator for a two-qubit system, specifically focusing on the reduced density operator of one subsystem. The original poster presents their approach and results, seeking clarification on a potential mistake in their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the density operator for a two-qubit system and its reduced form for one qubit. They express uncertainty about their calculations and seek feedback on their understanding of the density operator's definition.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest reconsidering the original poster's calculation of the density operator, specifically pointing out the need to include cross terms in the outer product. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of the density operator definition.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses confusion regarding the definition of the density operator and its application to a collection of pure states, indicating a potential misunderstanding that is being addressed in the discussion.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
Homework Statement
From Nielsen's QC&QI, in page 109 (The schmidt decomposition), it reads that:
As an example, consider the state of two qubits, ##\left( \left | 00 \right> +\left | 01 \right> +\left | 11 \right> \right) / \sqrt 3##. This has no obvious symmetry property, yet if you calculate ##tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^A \right )}^2 \right )## and ##tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^B \right )}^2 \right )## you will discover that they have the same value, ##\frac 7 9## in each case.
Relevant Equations
The density operator for a system is ## \rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left |\psi _i \right> \left < \psi _i \right |##.
Also, ## tr \left( A \left | \psi \right > \left < \psi \right | \right) =\left < \psi \left |A \right | \psi \right > ##
Consider the first qubit (subsystem A):

First, the density operator for the system AB is ## \rho ^{AB} =\frac { \left |00 \right > \left <00 \right |+ \left |01 \right > \left < 01\right |+\left | 11\right > \left < 11\right | } 3 ##.

Then, the reduced density operator of subsystem A is ## \rho ^A = \frac { \left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+ \left |0 \right > \left < 0\right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 3 =\frac { 2\left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 3 ##.

Thus, ## \left ( \rho ^A \right ) ^2=\frac { 4\left |0 \right > \left <0 \right |+\left | 1\right > \left < 1\right | } 9##.

So, ## tr \left ( {\left( \rho ^A \right )}^2 \right ) =\frac 5 9##.

I overchecked the procedure several times, but I can't see where am I wrong.

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to think again about the result you got for ##\rho^{AB}##
 
cpt_carrot said:
You might want to think again about the result you got for ##\rho^{AB}##

Hi, cpt_carrot. I still can't figure the mistake.

Here is my reasoning:

There are three possible states : ## \left | 00 \right> , \left | 01 \right> , \left | 11 \right> ## all with probabilitities of ##\frac 1 3##.

So ##\rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left | \psi _i \right > \left < \psi _i \right |=\frac { \left |00 \right > \left <00 \right |+ \left |01 \right > \left < 01\right |+\left | 11\right > \left < 11\right | } 3 ##.

Maybe I understand the definition of density operator in a wrong way.

Could you help me point the mistake? Thanks!
 
You need to include the cross terms in the outer product. The density matrix for your pure state ##|\psi\rangle## is ##\rho= |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|## which includes terms like ##|00\rangle\langle 01|##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haorong Wu
cpt_carrot said:
You need to include the cross terms in the outer product. The density matrix for your pure state ##|\psi\rangle## is ##\rho= |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|## which includes terms like ##|00\rangle\langle 01|##
Oh, so ##
\rho \equiv \sum_i p_i \left | \psi _i \right > \left < \psi _i \right |## should be applied to a collect of pure states.
I am going to redo the calculation again.
Thanks, cpt_carrot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K