Trade limit specialisation NEED HELP

  • Thread starter Thread starter phynoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit trade
AI Thread Summary
Econia should specialize in the production of good A, while Optima should focus on good B, based on the principle of comparative advantage. The trade limit is established when the price of trade exceeds the opportunity cost of production for each nation. For Econia, the trade limit is set at 1A for 2B, as producing B is less efficient for them. If the trade price for B goes above this limit, Econia would prefer to produce B themselves rather than trade. Understanding these limits is crucial for effective specialization and trade between nations.
phynoob
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is the question..

Suppose that by devoting all of its resources to the production of A, the nation of Econia can produce 50A. By devoting all of its resources to the production of B, Econia can produce 25B. The comparable figures for the nation of Optima are 5A and 5B. According to the principle of comparative advantage, which nation will specialise in which products? What are the limits to the terms of trade?

My attempt on the question: Econia will produce A and Optima will produce B due to Compa. Advantage.
Limit : 1A=1A to 1B= 2B (im not sure whether it is correct anot)

Can anyone highlight on the methods or a guideline to derive the trade limit for specialisation?

APPRECIATED! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All that matters for comparative advantage is, well, the comparative advantage. The first can produce 2 A for every B, while the second can produce only 1. Therefore the first 'should' specialize in A and the second in B.
 
thx ggreathouse..i do understand the concept of specialisation. But, how do u establish a trade limit equation?
BUMP the thread!
 
Bump!
 
the limits for the price of trade will be whenever the country can produce the good by itself for less cost, for example if B trades for more then 2A then one country would be better off not trading.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top