Transfer problem (maximum number of Mbit/s)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dont_know
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the maximum transfer rate of a spectrum divided into 225 channels of 4 kHz each, utilizing QAM-256 modulation. Each channel can transmit 32,000 bits per second, resulting in a total theoretical transfer rate of 7.2 Mbit/s. However, achieving a transfer rate of 24 Mbit/s is contingent upon maintaining a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) greater than 83 dB across all channels, without interference. Practical implementation challenges may prevent reaching this theoretical maximum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of QAM-256 modulation
  • Knowledge of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) principles
  • Familiarity with channel capacity calculations
  • Basic grasp of the Shannon-Hartley theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Shannon-Hartley theorem for channel capacity limits
  • Explore techniques to improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio in communication systems
  • Investigate practical implementations of QAM-256 in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about interference mitigation strategies in multi-channel systems
USEFUL FOR

Telecommunications engineers, network designers, and anyone involved in optimizing data transfer rates in communication systems.

dont_know
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a spectrum of 900khz that is divided into channels of 4kHz each. That makes 225 channels. Then each channel can transfer 4000 symbols/sec. I will be using the QAM-256 and that allows 8 bits/symbol. That means each channel can transfer 4000*8= 32e3 bit/s. And the channels in total makes 32e3*225=7.2e6 That makes the transfer rate 7.2 Mbit/s. Is that correct? Is it impossible to go up to 24 Mbit with my current settings or am I thinking things wrong here??

Dont_know
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You are missing the effect of Signal-to-Noise ratio on the capacity of your channel. You can theoretically go to 24 Mbit/s if you have an SNR of > 83 dB on all your 4 kHz channels, and no interference between them... (the practical issues are significant!)

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon–Hartley_theorem

... of course, this is the best you could do if there were no other implementation losses, etc.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K