I Transform Bases for 4-Vectors in Ref. Frames

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! Why do we need to impose a change on the basis vector, when going from a reference frame to another. I understand that the components of the vector and the basis change using inverse matrices (the components use a matrix and the vector basis the inverse). But the transformation condition we impose on the components of the 4-vector, already impoose that the vector has the same length in any frame. So why do we need to make sure the vector looks the same in all frames (i.e. why we bother to apply any transformation to the basis, if we are able to keep the length constant anyway)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
Hello! Why do we need to impose a change on the basis vector, when going from a reference frame to another. I understand that the components of the vector and the basis change using inverse matrices (the components use a matrix and the vector basis the inverse). But the transformation condition we impose on the components of the 4-vector, already impoose that the vector has the same length in any frame. So why do we need to make sure the vector looks the same in all frames (i.e. why we bother to apply any transformation to the basis, if we are able to keep the length constant anyway)?

Well, do you understand how it works in the case of two-dimensional plane geometry?

Take a piece of paper, and draw two points on it, and call them A and B. There are many ways to get from A to B. In the picture below, we show two of them:
  • the red path: Go a distance 60 units in direction \hat{x} and then go a distance 25 units in direction \hat{y}
  • the blue path: Go a distance 39 units in direction \hat{x'} and then go a distance 52 units in direction \hat{y'}
So the vector from A to B can be described by the coordinates (60, 25) in the coordinate system (x,y) or it can be described by the coordinates (39, 52) in the coordinate system (x', y'). The lengths of the vector is the same in either coordinate system: 65 units. But the basis vectors have changed: from \hat{x}, \hat{y} to \hat{x'}, \hat{y'}.

routes.png
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top