I Transform from polar to cartesian

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming a probability distribution from polar to Cartesian coordinates, specifically a uniform distribution on the unit circle. The initial polar representation is given by a delta function, which transforms to a Cartesian form that presented an issue with integration yielding a value of 1/2 instead of 1. It is clarified that the variables X and Y, defined as X = cos(Θ) and Y = sin(Θ), are not independent but are constrained by the relationship X² + Y² = 1. The problem arose from the delta function's satisfaction for two values of x, necessitating a correction in the integration process to account for this duplication. This highlights the importance of careful handling of transformations in probability distributions.
mathman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
8,130
Reaction score
574
TL;DR
Integrand defined on unit circle. Express in (x,y) coordinates.
Probability distribution - uniform on unit circle. In polar coordinates ##dg(r,a)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\delta(r-1)rdrda##. This transforms in ##df(x,y)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\delta(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}-1)dxdy##. The problem I ran into was the second integral was 1/2 instead of 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a univariate distribution. \Theta is uniformly distributed in [0,2\pi]; X = \cos \Theta and Y = \sin\Theta can then be determined from that.
\begin{align*}<br /> P(X &lt; x) &amp;= \begin{cases}<br /> 0 &amp; x &lt; -1 \\<br /> P(\arccos(x) &lt; \Theta &lt; 2\pi - \arccos(x)) &amp; -1 \leq x \leq 1\\<br /> 1 &amp; x &gt; 1 <br /> \end{cases} \\<br /> P(Y &lt; y) &amp;= \begin{cases}<br /> 0 &amp; y &lt; -1 \\<br /> P(\pi + \arcsin(|y|) &lt; \Theta &lt; 2\pi - \arcsin(|y|)), &amp; -1 \leq y &lt; 0 \\<br /> P(0 &lt; \Theta &lt; \arcsin(y)) + P(\pi - \arcsin(y) &lt; \Theta &lt; 2\pi), &amp; 0 \leq y \leq 1 \\<br /> 1, &amp; y &gt; 1<br /> \end{cases}<br /> \end{align*}<br />

X and Y are not independent, but satisfy X^2 + Y^2 = 1.
 
I discovered the problem. ##\delta(\sqrt{x^2+y^2}-1)## is satisfied for two values of x, so when integrating to get a function of y, I had to double the single value I had obtained.
 
Last edited: