Transformation matrix for components of acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The transformation matrix for vectors is effective for position vectors but not for acceleration vectors in spherical coordinates due to the time-dependent nature of the basis vectors. In spherical coordinates, the basis vectors change over time, complicating the transformation process. The derivative of the radial unit vector \(\hat{r}\) illustrates how its components depend on both angular velocities and the angles themselves. Consequently, when calculating the velocity of a particle, both the rate of change of position and the change in the unit vector must be considered. This complexity is why the transformation matrix does not directly apply to acceleration vectors.
world line
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello
any body can find my mistake ?!
TO find the component of a vector in other coordinate we can use the transformation matrix :

http://up98.org/upload/server1/01/z/ff96m5hl2uahgjw3u2un.jpg

but why this does nt work for acceleration vector ?
i mean why i can't derive the component of acceleration in spherical coordinate by use of this matrix ?
thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That matrix only transforms position vectors. In spherical coordinates, the basis vectors are changing with respect to time as well as the coefficients which means that the transformation is much more complicated.

If the basis vector in the r direction is
\hat{r}= \sin\theta\cos\phi\hat{x}+\sin\theta\sin\phi\hat{y}+\sin\theta\hat{z}

then,
\frac{d}{dt}\hat{r}=(\cos\theta\cos\phi\frac{d \theta}{dt}-\sin\theta\sin\phi\frac{d \phi}{dt})\hat{x}+(\cos\theta\sin\phi\frac{d \theta}{dt}+\sin\theta\cos\phi\frac{d \phi}{dt})\hat{y}+\cos\theta\frac{d \theta}{dt}\hat{z}

so, if the position of a particle is r(t)\hat{r} then its velocity is \frac{dr(t)}{dt}\hat{r}+r(t)\frac{d \hat{r}}{dt}.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top