Transformation of KE of Gummy Bear in Inelastic Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy transformations of a gummy bear stuck to the ceiling after an inelastic collision. When the gummy bear hits the ceiling, its kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy, sound, and potential energy due to deformation. The potential energy stored in the gummy bear's deformation is likened to the energy in a stretched spring, highlighting a deeper understanding of energy concepts. The conversation also references the Wigner energy from a documentary, drawing parallels to energy transformations in collisions. Overall, the exploration of these energy transformations demonstrates a thoughtful engagement with physics concepts despite limited formal education.
seekingtuva
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is a gummy bear stuck to the ceiling where I work. When it hit the ceiling, some of its kinetic energy would be transformed into thermal energy and some into sound. I'm wondering if some is also stored as potential energy in deforming the gummy bear slightly. Also, are there any other energy transformations that account for its final KE being zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
New potential energies in bonds formed with the roof are what would account for most of the loss I'd say.
There is potential energy in the deformation of the gummy bear, just like there's energy when you stretch a spring (or loss if you unstretch it), if you don't have a physics background, I applaud you for thinking about that one since most people who haven't taken a physics course (and even a lot who have) wouldn't think of that.
 
Cool! Thanks! I knew there were things I wasn't thinking of ... the reason I thought of potential energy due to deformation was because of a documentary I watched on the Windscale reactor fire, specifically the part where Wigner energy accumulated in the graphite. Very different materials and situation, I know, but it got me to thinking about how energy involved in a collision might cause deformations in a material that would not occur spontaneously without that energy input.

I never took physics past high school, but I'm glad I started learning it. It helps keep me sane.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top