Transformation of two dimensional random var

dannee
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
given the following Probability density function:

f x,y(x,y) = { 0.5, ( 0<y<1, 2y-x<2, 2y+x<2 }
0, else

and i need to find f z(z) while z=y-x

i got really confused while trying to calculate the borders of x and y for the integration.

i would be really thankful for someone explaining me how to come to the borders slow and step by step.

i got to the following equations: y < 2-z , y < (2+z)/3 , x < 2-z, x < (2-2z)/3

but i don't know how to resume from here. it said on the solution that borders are 0 to (2-2z)/3 for y and y-z to 2-2y for x. why?

thanks in advance for any help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi dannee.
The inequalities (0<y<1, 2y-x<2, 2y+x<2) define a region A in the (x,y)-plane.
You can follow these steps, in order to graphically "visualize" the problem:

1) Draw the region A in the (x,y)-plane

2) Introduce the two dimensional transformation u=x , z=y-x

3) Obtain the density function g(u,z) of the two dimensional random variable (U,Z)

4) From the inequalities between (x,y) derive the corresponding inequalities between (u,z).

5) From the inequalities between (u,z) draw the region A' in the (u,z)-plane. A' is the image of A under the transformation introduced in step 2).

6) Finally, from g(u,z) derive the marginal density function g(z)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top