Transforming Simultaneous Equations into Simplified Form for Easy Solving

mconn86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have the following two equations of the form:

A^2 - B^2=hj(k^2) and 2AB=mjk

and I need to get them into the form

A=k.sqrt(hj/2).{sqrt((1)+(m/hk)^2)+1}^(1/2)

and

B=k.sqrt(hj/2).{sqrt((1)+(m/hk)^2)-1}^(1/2)

I've been trying in vain for a while now and its starting to annoy me coz I know it should be simple. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about you just solve the second one for either A or B and plug it into the other one?
Didn't check it, but if they are really equivalent it should work.
 
Yeah I've done that, that's not the problem really,its just getting it into the form I need.
 
I'm not sure I'll get exactly what you got, but I'll give it a try.

A^2 - B^2=hj(k^2) and 2AB=mjk

and I need to get them into the form

A=k.sqrt(hj/2).{sqrt((1)+(m/hk)^2)+1}^(1/2)

The second one gives B = mjk/2A. Plugging this into the first one gives
A^2 - \frac{ (m j k / 2)^2 }{ A^2 } = h j k^2
Calling \alpha = A^2 and multiplying through by \alpha, we get
\alpha^2 - h j k^2 \alpha - (m j k / 2)^2 = 0
The solutions are
\alpha = \frac12\left( h j k^2 \pm \sqrt{h^2 j^2 k^4 + j^2 k^2 m^2 \right)
so let's take the positive one. From now on I'll start taking things out of square roots by using \sqrt{X Y^2} = Y \sqrt{X}, so you need the assumption that they are positive. First rewrite alpha into
\alpha = \cdot \frac{1}{2} \left(h j k^2 + h j k^2 \sqrt{1 + m^2 / (h^2 k^2)} \right)
and then take out h j k^2:
\alpha = k^2 \cdot \frac{h j}{2} \left(1 + \sqrt{1 + m^2 / (h^2 k^2)} \right)
Solve \alpha = A^2 for A (pick the positive root again), take the k^2 outside the square root and use \sqrt{a b} = \sqrt{a} \cdot \sqrt{b}.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top