Transient 1D radial conduction

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks assistance with a quick conduction calculation involving a 10mm thick slab of homogeneous material and discretized elements on its surface. They need to estimate the time required for the temperature at one point to rise by 1 degree K when another point's temperature is increased by 5 degrees K over a 2-second heating period. The thermal diffusivity of the material is approximately 1.92E-7 m²/s. The discussion includes clarifications about the geometry of the elements and the nature of heat transfer, with references to relevant literature for further guidance. The user expresses urgency in obtaining a rough estimate for their calculations.
jb26
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Morning all,

This is probably going to seem absurdly simple, however I need to do a very quick conduction calculation as part of a much larger problem I am working on. I was wondering if anyone would be able to give me some pointers as time is of the essence.

The scenario can be simplified as follows: I have a slab of homogeneous material 10mm thick that can be considered semi-inifinite with a series of discretised elements on top of it. The attached (terrible and uninformative) image shows two such elements; let's pretend they are 1mm apart. To further simplify we can consider the elements to not have area and simply act as points. All I need to know is how to calculate the time taken to raise the surface temperature at point 2 by a given amount (lets say 1degree K) when the surface temp of point 1 is raised above the ambient temperature of the bulk material by some amount (lets say 5 degree K) for a known transient heating "on" time (lets say 2s).

You can see I've been quite general, but this is because I need to try some different heating scenarios.

Thanks in advance for any help given.

J

EDIT: I know I put radial in the title, but I simplified the geometry when writing the post an forgot to change it, sorry!
 

Attachments

  • array pic.png
    array pic.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 401
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi JB26. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Some questions:

Is this a one shot deal, or is there an ongoing cycle?
Is it truly a linear array, or are the sources laid out on an area grid?
Are the elements truly points, or do they have area? This affects the solution.
What is the thermal diffusivity of the slab material?

Chet
 
Cheers chet,

I'm trying to keep it simple tbh as I am just after an estimate. In reality the elements aren't heat sources (there is a more complicated bioheat mechanism generating heat in the material from an external stimulus). The real array elements do have area, but again I am just wanting to estimate the time for heat to transfer from one point to another across the surface of a material for a transient case.

Thermal diffusivity is of the order 1.92E-7

Cheers
 
jb26 said:
Cheers chet,

I'm trying to keep it simple tbh as I am just after an estimate. In reality the elements aren't heat sources (there is a more complicated bioheat mechanism generating heat in the material from an external stimulus). The real array elements do have area, but again I am just wanting to estimate the time for heat to transfer from one point to another across the surface of a material for a transient case.

Thermal diffusivity is of the order 1.92E-7

Cheers

units of thermal diffusivity are m^2/s?
 
yes the thermal diffusivity I stated was in standard SI form of m^2/s

Funnily enough I have a copy of that book sat right next to me. I took it out for some reason a long time ago and only just realized I have it! That said, any help is still very gratefully received as that faster I can get a rough number the better.

I'll have a read of the thread and then try to find a similar problem in the book.

Cheers
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Back
Top