Transient Response of Straw Filling with Water

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the transient response observed when capping a straw, submerging it in water, and then releasing the cap. Upon release, the water initially rises above the water level in the glass, attributed to the upward momentum of the fluid and the sudden creation of a partial vacuum in the straw. This effect diminishes when the water level in the glass is lower, suggesting that the height of the water affects the transient behavior. The role of the meniscus curve is also considered, though its impact remains uncertain. Overall, the phenomenon highlights the complex interactions between fluid dynamics and pressure changes in a confined space.
Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1
Okay, since the most fluids I've studied are from the Euler equation in the context of plasma physics I may be asking a trivial question, but here goes anyway. What I am wondering about is why there is a transient response when I cap a straw with my finger, place the straw in water (while still capped), and then release my finger (while straw fully submerged in water). The water should just fill the straw to the water level, which is what happens in steady-state of course, but I noticed that initially the water in the straw actually goes a bit past the water level of the glass.

I noticed this at a restaurant the other day when I first got my full water glass, and I later noticed when the glass was only 1/3 full, instead of the 7/8 full, that I lost the effect. I couldn't come up with an answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've inadvertently noticed that effect as well. All that I can think of is that the upward momentum of the fluid carries it (very temporarily) past the water line. That, in conjunction with the sudden partial vacuum of releasing the previously pressurized air in the straw, might account for it. I don't know what effect the meniscus curve (either regular or reverse) has upon the final appearance.
 
I would imagine it's just the fluid's upward momentum. It reaches the equilibrium level with some remaining upward velocity, and therefore continues briefly past.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top