Transition of Photons & Electrons: How Lasers Work

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcgldr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons Photons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the process of electron transitions and photon emissions in lasers, questioning the nature of these interactions and the timing involved. It highlights that while photons are emitted when electrons transition between energy levels, the exact mechanics of this process, including the electron's path and speed during emission, remain complex and not fully understood. The conversation touches on quantum electrodynamics (QED) and the mathematical frameworks used to describe these interactions, emphasizing that the transition from excited states to ground states occurs probabilistically over time. The role of string theory is also mentioned as a potential avenue for understanding these phenomena. Ultimately, the intricacies of how electrons absorb and emit photons continue to invite further exploration and theoretical development.
rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,923
Reaction score
675
Assuming that process of electrons releasing photons isn't instaneous, what happens during the transition?

I'm also curious why lasers work. Photons passing through high energy molecules cause the eletrons to release photons with the same phase and direction, and I'm wondering how this release happens relative to the orbital path of the electron at the during the release period. The photons direction is always the same, but what is the electron's path and speed during the period of release?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that, in some cases, the photons direction lies in a well defied plane, but this assertion of photon's direction assumes you have a well defined wave behavior which you call photon, which I guess it is not true.

Best Regards

DaTario
 
Photon absorption and release from electrons would be interesting even if it were instantaneous...and it may be. How does a "particle" with mass, energy and momentum absorb or release a "particle" that has energy but no mass nor momentum?
I guess string theory provides the latest hypothetical insights where it is conjectured all particles are vibrating strings. String theory proposes one string (an electron) either aborsbs another vibrating string or splits like an amobea into two strings with different vibrational characteristics, one beingthe photon. But why electrons only absorb and emit photons in quanta matching hypothetical orbit levels/energies is not fully understood.
Having rules and math for interactions to describe what is observed doesn't necessarily mean the underlying detail is fully understood. In ten or twenty years there may well be another theory to explain it!
 
Jeff Reid said:
Assuming that process of electrons releasing photons isn't instaneous, what happens during the transition?

In the specific case you mention, it is difficult to really work out what I'm going to sketch in detail - I even wonder if it can be done within the actual theoretical framework of QED, where we only have a working machinery for asymptotic states (the S-matrix).
But we could imagine the following: the coupling between the atomic system (the electron in a potential, if it were) and the free photon state (the state of the unperturbed EM field) results in a unitary time evolution operator U(t) which acts upon the initial state |excited atom>|n photons> and results into something which takes on the form:
U(t) |excited atom>|n photons> = a(t) |excited atom>|n photons> + b(t) |ground state atom>|n+1 photons>

where a(t) is a falling amplitude with time and b(t) is a rising amplitude with time, such that after some time T, a(T) is essentially 0, and b(T) is essentially 1.

So the quantum state transits smoothly from the |excited atom>|n photons> state at t=0 to the |ground state atom>|n+1 photons> at time T.
But of course a measurement of this state will make us decide, probabilistically, between the first or the second state. The longer we wait, the more chance we have to perceive the photon emission. The probability to observe an emission is given by |b(t)|^2.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top