Transition to Physics: Tips for Newbies from a Finance Background

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martinus de Wet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Transition
AI Thread Summary
A user with an MS in Finance and a background in banking expresses a desire to transition into physics but faces challenges due to time constraints from personal commitments. They seek advice on part-time or distance learning options that offer a traditional educational experience, as well as guidance on whether to pursue a bachelor's or graduate degree in physics. Responses emphasize that a graduate program typically requires an undergraduate degree in physics or a closely related field. It is suggested that taking the physics GRE can help determine readiness for graduate studies. The discussion also highlights the importance of structured education in physics, as informal study through open resources may not suffice. A participant shares their unconventional journey from community college to a prestigious physics program, illustrating that success in the field is achievable later in life.
Martinus de Wet
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ahooi!

Newbie here.

I guess I am a bit of a late developer. Whereas I often meet physics majors who wish to move to the world of finance and make big bucks, I am quite the opposite. I have an MS in Finance, work in banking, but have always gravitated towards the technological side of things. Working with technology you can't help but to become interested in the fundamental building blocks and to contemplate the possibilities. Hence I'd like to move to physics.

So my question is: How should I approach this?

* I probably wouldn't be able to become a full time student again - married with bonds et al. So what are the best options in terms of part time studying. Also, I did my MS part time and it was quite a tough trail, not ever having contact time with lecturers, tutors or other students. Are there part time/distance learning programs where you have more/some of the perks of the 'traditional' education process?

* The last time I formally studied natural sciences was in high school. Should I start fresh with a bachelors degree, or could I conceivably start at graduate level?

* Am I perhaps mistaken, wanting to take the degree route? Should I rather study physics informally by utilizing various open resources and then try my hand at writing a paper when I feel up to it?

* Regarding open sources: I am finding it difficult to navigate open sources from introductory to advanced content. Any help in better utilization of open sources would be greatly appreciated!

Special thanks to anyone willing to reply!

m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One cannot start a graduate program in physics unless they have an undergraduate degree in physics, or in a field very closely related to physics. It's also not too conceivable to get a physics education from open sources such as you suggest. A real physics education requires a lot of structure.

Becoming a part time student and taking just a couple classes at a time is definitely a possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes Martinus de Wet
Martinus de Wet said:
* The last time I formally studied natural sciences was in high school. Should I start fresh with a bachelors degree, or could I conceivably start at graduate level?

There is an easy way to tell this. Take the physics GRE. Here is an older exam: http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/undergrad/greStuff/exam_GR9677.pdf

If you do well (say, >50% percentile), then you are ready for grad school.
 
  • Like
Likes Martinus de Wet
Thanks both for the advice!
 
To add a bit more, starting down this path in an unconventional way is not that uncommon. Speaking to my own path, I'm a high school dropout that started at a community college at age 25. I'm currently spending my summer in an internship at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory working on the NuMI neutrino beamline and the MiniBooNE experiment. This fall I'm transferring to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, which has one of the best physics programs in the world. It's definitely possible to start later in life and still succeed in this field.
 
  • Like
Likes Intrastellar, Cumberland and Martinus de Wet
Thanks mate - that's inspiring.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top