Boorglar
- 210
- 10
Hello,
I am taking some microwave engineering courses and was trying to explain the concept of reflection coefficients to my friend, but he asked me a question I am unable to answer...
So we know that given a transmission line with characteristic impedance Z_0 terminated with a load impedance Z_L, the voltage reflected is related to the incident voltage by the reflection coefficient, \Gamma_L = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0}.
Now what happens if we pick Z_L + Z_0 = 0? This could happen if both Z_L and Z_0 are purely imaginary, and one is the negative of the other (maybe some inductive and some capacitive reactances cancelling each other). Normally in our courses we considered Z_0 being a real number, usually 50 ohms. But if I assume it to be complex, then the reflection coefficient can become larger than 1, and even infinite like in that case.
So what's the physical meaning of an infinite reflection coefficient / reflection coefficient larger than 1? That seems to contradict conservation of power, because you get more power reflected than input power...
I am taking some microwave engineering courses and was trying to explain the concept of reflection coefficients to my friend, but he asked me a question I am unable to answer...
So we know that given a transmission line with characteristic impedance Z_0 terminated with a load impedance Z_L, the voltage reflected is related to the incident voltage by the reflection coefficient, \Gamma_L = \frac{Z_L - Z_0}{Z_L + Z_0}.
Now what happens if we pick Z_L + Z_0 = 0? This could happen if both Z_L and Z_0 are purely imaginary, and one is the negative of the other (maybe some inductive and some capacitive reactances cancelling each other). Normally in our courses we considered Z_0 being a real number, usually 50 ohms. But if I assume it to be complex, then the reflection coefficient can become larger than 1, and even infinite like in that case.
So what's the physical meaning of an infinite reflection coefficient / reflection coefficient larger than 1? That seems to contradict conservation of power, because you get more power reflected than input power...