Transmission line Secondary Coefficients

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the secondary coefficients of a transmission line, specifically the characteristic impedance ##Z_0##, the attenuation constant ##\alpha##, and the phase constant ##\beta## at a frequency of ##1 GHz##. Participants explore the application of relevant equations and share their calculations, addressing potential uncertainties in their results.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the primary coefficients and attempts to calculate ##\alpha## and ##\beta## using provided formulas, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their final results.
  • Another participant confirms that the values look okay but notes that ##\beta## should be expressed in radians per meter and suggests rounding to appropriate significant figures.
  • A later reply provides a method for calculating ##Z_0## and shares their results, questioning the correctness of their answer.
  • Some participants agree that the calculations appear correct, while others introduce an alternative formula for calculating ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, suggesting that the original formula may only be valid under certain conditions.
  • One participant provides specific numerical results for ##\alpha## and ##\beta## using the alternative formula, indicating a slight difference from previous calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the validity of the calculations presented, but there is disagreement regarding the applicability of different formulas for ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, with some suggesting that the original formula may not hold under all conditions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made in the calculations, particularly concerning the neglect of certain terms in the alternative formula for ##\alpha## and ##\beta##. The discussion also highlights potential dependencies on the definitions of the coefficients and the significance of rounding in the results.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals working with transmission lines, particularly those interested in the calculations of secondary coefficients and the implications of different formulas in their analysis.

David J
Gold Member
Messages
140
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


A transmission line has the primary coefficients as given below.

##R=2\Omega/m##
##L=8 nH/m##
##G=0.5 mS/m##
##C=0.23 pF/m##

Determine the lines secondary coefficients ##Z0##. ##\alpha## and ##\beta## at a frequency of ##1 GHz##

Homework Equations


[/B]
In my notes I am given

##\alpha=\frac{R}{2}\sqrt\frac{C}{L} +\frac{G}{2}\sqrt\frac{L}{C}## and ##\beta=\omega\sqrt{LC}##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##\alpha=\frac{2}{2}\sqrt\frac{0.23 X 10^-12}{8 X 10^-9} +\frac{0.5 X 10^-3}{2}\sqrt\frac{8 X 10^-9}{0.23 X10^-12}##

##\alpha=1 X \sqrt{2.875 X 10^-5} + (2.4 X 10^-4)\sqrt{34,782.6}##

##\alpha=\sqrt{2.875 X 10^-5} + (2.4 X 10^-4)\sqrt{34,782.6}##

##\alpha=(5.362 X 10^-3) +0.044760 = 0.050121902## nepers per meter

I think this is correct. I am unsure how to input the single multiplication sign `X` in LaTeX form. I think my " to the power of`s" are correct for ##R, L, G## and ##C## but I am unsure about the final result in nepers per meter

For the second part I got the following:-

##\beta=\omega\sqrt{LC}##

##(2\pi)(1 X 10^9) \sqrt{(8 X 10^-9)(0.23 X 10^-21)}##

So I have ##6,283,185,307\sqrt{1.84 X 10^-21}##

So ##6,283,185,307(4.289522 X 10^-11)=0.269518623## radians

So ##\beta= 0.269518623## radians

This second answer I am not so sure as I have some very large numbers but I have followed the examples in my notes.

Any comments on the two attempts above would be appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The values look okay. ##\beta## should be radians per meter. You'll want to round to the appropriate number of significant figures to match your "givens".

For multiplication in LaTeX you can use \times or \cdot : ##a \cdot b = a \times b##.
 
Thanks a lot for your help with this
 
gneill said:
The values look okay. ##\beta## should be radians per meter. You'll want to round to the appropriate number of significant figures to match your "givens".

For multiplication in LaTeX you can use \times or \cdot : ##a \cdot b = a \times b##.
l Following onto this question i got all the same workings however we needed to find Zo aswell. Using
0f7a2214412eaf12fa94bf33a612ab95c0c24c2b
with the values above I got Zo=179.427+j26.5060 Ω or in polar Zo=181.375 /_+8.403° Ω (sorry don't currently have software to do the polar expression so used /_ to signify the angle).Does this sound correct for this answer?
 
Connorm1 said:
l Following onto this question i got all the same workings however we needed to find Zo aswell. Using
0f7a2214412eaf12fa94bf33a612ab95c0c24c2b
with the values above I got Zo=179.427+j26.5060 Ω or in polar Zo=181.375 /_+8.403° Ω (sorry don't currently have software to do the polar expression so used /_ to signify the angle).Does this sound correct for this answer?

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=√((2+(16π)i)/(0.0005+i(0.00046π))) Here's my workings using wolframalpha
 
Looks good.
 
gneill said:
Looks good.

Thanks @gneill! Only bit i was struggling on! But I hoped it'll be as simple as use the equation and plug in values. Helpful as always :)
 
In my opinion, the correct formula it is as follows:
α+jβ=sqrt[(R+jꞷL)x(G+jꞷC)]
The formula α=1/2xRxSQRT(C/L)+1/2xGxSQRT(L/C) it is good in the case in which
we can neglect R with respect to ꞷ*L and G with respect to ꞷ*C.
The difference is not more than 1-2%, indeed.
a=0.051409 and b=0.272549
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K