Transmitting information using gravitational waves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the potential of using gravitational waves (GWs) for information transmission, following their confirmation by LIGO. Participants highlight the immense challenges in generating and detecting GWs, noting that the energy required to produce measurable gravitational waves is currently beyond human capability. While theoretically possible, practical applications of GWs for communication are overshadowed by the efficiency of electromagnetic waves. The discussion also touches on the complexities of detecting gravitational waves and the limitations of current technology in correlating them with electromagnetic signals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational waves and their properties
  • Familiarity with LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) technology
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic waves and their transmission
  • Basic principles of piezoelectric materials and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational wave generation and detection
  • Explore advancements in LIGO technology and future detectors
  • Study the relationship between gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation
  • Investigate piezoelectric materials and their potential for signal generation
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers interested in gravitational wave technology, communication systems, and the intersection of gravitational and electromagnetic phenomena.

  • #61
PeterDonis said:
Essentially no average motion of the object as a whole. But individual atoms in the object are certainly moving: that is what "strain" means.

Yes, and your statement very helpful and reminds me why I work in the TT gauge. How is the word "moving" defined in your statement? In the TT gauge with the interatomic forces set to zero (for argument sake) the atoms remain stationary with respect to the chosen coordinates while the interatomic distances change by virtue of the metric strain. This geometrically strained configuration of atoms will have a displacement current and associated electric fields. All this happens with the atoms stationary wrt the chosen coordinates.

Clearly the interatomic forces are at play so even in TT coordinates the atoms will accelerate with the acceleration govern by the equations of motion given in post #29. One must solve this dynamical problem in order to have a complete picture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Paul Colby said:
How is the word "moving" defined in your statement?

The proper distances between at least some pairs of individual atoms are changing with time (if you like, proper time of either atom of a given pair).
 
  • #63
PeterDonis said:
The proper distances between at least some pairs of individual atoms are changing with time (if you like, proper time of either atom of a given pair).

Hum, motion was always defined relative to a frame. Sounds like a really confusing definition.
 
  • #64
Paul Colby said:
motion was always defined relative to a frame

If you insist on doing this, you can always define a proper reference frame for one atom (basically Fermi normal coordinates centered on its worldline), and then look at whether adjacent atoms have coordinate motion in this frame.
 
  • #65
Is there anything in current theory which could allow faster-than-light signals of any sort ?
 
  • #66
Shane Kennedy said:
Is there anything in current theory which could allow faster-than-light signals of any sort ?

No.
 
  • #67
To look at gravity wave communication from a radio engineering perspective, a good place to start is John D Kraus' (inventor of the helical antenna in the 1940s and professor at Ohio State for many years) 1991 article, "Will Gravity Wave Communication be Possible?" The difficulty in producing and detecting GW is analogous to poor impedance matching in an antenna connection.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/84527/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul Colby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K