MHB Transpose Formula: Solve x=7-2y | Get Help Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter fordy2707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
To transpose the equation y = 7 - 2x and solve for x, the correct formula is x = (7 - y) / 2, as confirmed by the calculations. The initial misunderstanding arose from incorrectly rearranging the equation, leading to the wrong expression x = (7 + y) / 2. The step-by-step breakdown clarifies that reversing the operations applied to x yields the correct result. Additionally, verifying the functions f(x) and g(y) confirms their inverse relationship, ensuring the transposition is accurate. This comprehensive approach aids in understanding the process of transposing formulas effectively.
fordy2707
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi,thanks in advance for your help
Ive been given the task to transpose

To make x the subject from y=7-2x

Which in my mind x= 7+y / 2

But my book is saying X=7-y / 2

Is the book correct if so where / why am I going wrong ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$y=7-2x$$

and told to solve for $x$. First, let's add $2x-y$ to both sides, to get:

$$2x=7-y$$

Now, divide through by $2$:

$$x=\frac{7-y}{2}$$

This agrees with the book's result. :)
 
Thanks for that , I've been watching YouTube videos for the best part of today trying to get my head round transposing formulae .think I'm just about there now
 
Here is another approach:

Suppose $y = 7 - 2x$

Let's examine the steps we take to get to $y$, starting with $x$.

1. First we multiply $x$ by $2$. Now we have $2x$.

2. Next we multiply by $-1$, so we have $-2x$.

3. Finally, we add $7$, so we have $7 - 2x$, and we have arrived at $y$.

To "undo" this, we do the "undoing" operation of each of our 3 steps, IN REVERSE ORDER.

First, we subtract $7$. this "undoes" the adding of $7$, so we have $y - 7$.

Next, we multiply by $-1$ (multiplying by $-1$ twice leaves us where we were originally, so multiplying by $-1$ "undoes itself"). This gives us $(-1)(y - 7) = -y - (-7) = -y + 7 = 7 - y$.

Finally, we multiply by $\frac{1}{2}$ which is what "undoes" multiplication by $2$:

$\frac{1}{2}(7 - y) = \dfrac{7-y}{2}$.

Since we "undid", everything we "did" to get from $x$ to $y$, we must now be back at $x$:

$x = \dfrac{7 - y}{2}$.

If we have $f(x) = 7 - 2x$, and $g(y) = \dfrac{7 - y}{2}$, as a final check, we verify that:

$g(f(x)) = x$, and $f(g(y)) = y$.

$g(f(x)) = \dfrac{7 - f(x)}{2} = \dfrac{7 - (7 - 2x)}{2} = \dfrac{7 - 7 + 2x}{2} = \dfrac{2x}{2} = x$

$f(g(y)) = 7 - 2(g(y)) = 7 - 2\left(\dfrac{7 - y}{2}\right) = 7 - (7 - y) = 7 - 7 + y = y$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top