Transpose of Grassmanian variables

ismaili
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Say, \psi^1,\ \psi^2 are Dirac spinors, and M is a matrix composed of Dirac matrices. Is the following equation hold?
\bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2 = -\Big(\bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2\Big)^T
I'm not quite sure, here is my derivation:
<br /> \bar{\psi^1}M\psi^2 = \bar{\psi^1}_{i}M_{ij}\psi^2_j = - \psi^2_jM^T_{ji}\psi^1_i = -\Big(\psi^1_iM_{ij}\psi^2_j\Big)^T = -\Big(\psi^1M\psi^2\Big)^T<br />
where the last step, i.e. the third equality is what I'm worried about. I originally think that the change of order of the third equality is totally due to the operation of transpose (superscript "T"), so there is no need to change sign in the third equality.
Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right. The transpose operation does not change the sign of the equation, so the third equality is correct.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top