Trapezium rule, what does dx represent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rochefort
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dx
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the interpretation of "dx" in the context of the trapezium rule for approximating definite integrals. Participants explore whether "dx" can be equated to the height of trapezoids and question its role in the approximation process.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to define "dx" in relation to the trapezium rule, questioning if it can be considered equivalent to the height of the trapezoids. Others suggest that "dx" does not appear in the approximation itself and is more of a differential element. There are also inquiries about the implications of using "(dx)^2" in the context of the trapezium rule.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants provide insights into the relationship between "dx" and the trapezium rule, while others express confusion about the use of "(dx)^2" and its meaning in the integral context.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the original problem setup, particularly concerning the use of "(dx)^2" and its implications. Participants are navigating through assumptions and definitions related to the trapezium rule and its application.

Rochefort
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What does the "dx", associated with the definite integral represent for the trapezium rule? Could dx=h? (the heights of the trapeziums)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not entirely sure what you're asking here. If you are referring to the trapezium rule for approximating definite integrals, then dx should not appear in the approximation at all.

If you are asking what dx is an "analog" to in the physical trapezoid, well, nothing really. It is a differential element of the line of the trapezoid on the x-axis, I suppose..
 
It's seems to me that dx represents the heights and the rest of the definite integral represents
{2(y0+yn)+(y1+...+yn-1)}
 
If it was (dx)^ 2 what change would it make to the rule?
 
The point of the "trapezoid rule", explained in any Calculus textbook, is that instead of approximating f(x) by a constant (as is done in the "Euler" rule), we approximate it by the straight line from x_0, f(x_0)) to the "next point", (x_0+ h, f(x_0+ h)). In that case, rather than rectangles we have trapezoid where the two "bases" are f(x_0) and the other is f(x_0+ h). Yes, the distance along the x-axis, from x_0 to x_0+ h, which is, of course, h, is the "height" of the trapezoid. ("h" in the trapezoid rule is NOT "dx"- you should be thinking "\Delta x" instead.)

By the way, if you use an "Euler" rule, always choosing the value of the function at the left hand end of the interval as the height of the rectangle, then do another "Euler" rule, always choosing the value of the function at the right end of the interval as the height of the rectangle, and then average the two answers, you get exactly the result of the "trapezoid" rule. Draw a few examples to convince yourself of that.
 
I'm trying to manipulate
/lambda
| sqrt(1+cos(x)) (dx)^2
/ 0
Into the form described by the trapezium rule, how would I do that?
 
Unless this is just something I know nothing about, I would say having dx squared is completely nonsensical.
 
Rochefort said:
I'm trying to manipulate
/lambda
| sqrt(1+cos(x)) (dx)^2
/ 0
Into the form described by the trapezium rule, how would I do that?

It's not clear what the (dx)^2 represents in your integral. Where did this integral come from.

As a point of information, for the trapezoidal rule, Δx represents the spacing of the abscissas, while y represents the ordinates, or heights, of the function being integrated.
 
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what the (dx)^2 represents in your integral. Where did this integral come from.

/lambda
| Sqrt(1+cos(x)) dx= (u)
/0

u(dx)=m This is because "u" represents mass per unit length

Therefore I said

m= /lambda
|Sqrt(1+cos(x))(dx)^2
/0
 
  • #10
Rochefort said:
/lambda
| Sqrt(1+cos(x)) dx= (u)
/0

u(dx)=m This is because "u" represents mass per unit length

Therefore I said

m= /lambda
|Sqrt(1+cos(x))(dx)^2
/0
Do you know Calculus?

Is you original problem written something like the following?

\displaystyle \int_{\!0}^{\!\!1}\sqrt{1+\cos(x)}\,dx = (u)
 
  • #11
It is not clear to me why some of these parentheses are present (in (u) and u(dx)), but it seems to me that he says

\begin{align*}
m &= udx, \\
u &= \int_0^{\lambda} \sqrt{1 + \cos x} \, dx,
\end{align*}

whence

\begin{equation*}
m = \int_0^{\lambda} \sqrt{1 + \cos x} \, (dx)^2.
\end{equation*}

This is, of course, nonsensical. Taking a stab in the dark, perhaps it started as

\begin{align*}
dm &= udx, \\
u &= \sqrt{1 + \cos x},
\end{align*}

but I could be completely wrong.
 
  • #12
Quesadilla said:
\begin{align*}
dm &= udx, \\
u &= \sqrt{1 + \cos x},
\end{align*}

but I could be completely wrong.

You are right!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K