Matter Waves & Electron Traps: Angular Momentum Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter emperrotta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
emperrotta
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading about matter waves and electron traps.

the textbook states, by the equation:

hf = \DeltaE = Ehigh - Elow

If an electron confined to a one-dimensional infinite potential well is to absorb a photon, the energy hf of the photon must equal the energy difference \DeltaE between the initial energy level of the electron and a higher level.

Then as an aside, the textbook states:
Although the above equation and what we have discussed about photon absorption and emission can be applied to physical (real) electron traps, they actually cannot be applied to one-dimensional (unreal) electron traps. The reason involves the need to conserve angular momentum in a photon absorption or emission process.

I do not understand this statement about angular momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's because a photon carries angular momentum, but in 1-D the concept of angular momentum is not defined.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top