How Does a Harmonic Oscillator Behave When Traveling at Constant Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamiry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
tamiry
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi,

i'm trying to see how does an HO, traveling with constant speed v looks like. suppose a unitless system
H = P^2+(X-vt)^2
define
Y = X-vt
then
H = P^2+Y^2

i can see that [P,Y] = -i (unitless - no h-bar) so i guess it means that P and Y are conjugate space/momentum operators. therefore the solution for this is, using ehrenfest theorem
<Y> = Y(0)cos(t)+P(0)sin(t)
<P> = P(0)cos(t)-Y(0)sin(t)
where Y(0) is the expectation value of Y at t = 0 and the same for P(0).
now, going back to X, assuming the state is a square-integrable one
Y(0) = X(0) - v*0 = X(0)
<Y> = <X-vt> = <X> - vt<state|state> = <X>-vt
<X> = X(0)cos(t)+P(0)sin(t)+vt
<P> = P(0)cos(t)-X(0)sin(t)

now this makes some sense, <X> really oscillates around a value increasing with rate v, but P seems unchanged. I'd expect P to have a constant part as well, with size v since that is the constant velocity.
i've written the ehrenfest theorem equations for the original P,X and I've noticed that if I set P_new = P-v is solves those equations. so where did I get it wrong?

thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for the help!You are on the right track, but you made a mistake. The P that you defined in the Hamiltonian H=P^2+Y^2 is the momentum operator associated to the Y coordinate, and not the original momentum operator P. To get the solution for the original momentum operator, you need to use the Ehrenfest theorem for the original P,X coordinates: <P> = P(0)cos(t)-X(0)sin(t) + v. This equation has the expected form, with a constant term v that represents the constant velocity of the HO.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top