Triac - Power dissipated in light bulb

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the power dissipated in a light bulb controlled by a triac in a dimmer switch, specifically when the firing angle is set to α=∏/3. Participants explore various methods of calculation, including the use of RMS and peak voltages, integration techniques, and assumptions regarding current and resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the peak voltage and attempts to find the load voltage using a specific formula, leading to a power dissipation estimate of 88.6 Watts.
  • Another participant points out that the assumption of constant current between full conduction and limited conduction is incorrect, suggesting that the RMS current will change.
  • A different participant recalculates the power dissipated as 79.5 Watts, but is advised to retain more decimal places in intermediate results.
  • Some participants express confusion over the use of sin² in calculations, questioning its relevance to the voltage waveform.
  • Integration techniques are discussed, with one participant proposing to integrate the voltage over the firing angle to find average power, while others suggest using peak voltage instead of RMS due to the altered waveform.
  • One participant arrives at a significantly different average voltage and expresses uncertainty about their calculations, leading to further discussion on the use of sin² in power calculations.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the resistance of the light bulb varies with temperature, complicating the assumption of constant resistance in calculations.
  • Several participants share their calculations and results, with some arriving at values around 80 Watts, while others express confusion about the methods used by their peers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the correct method for calculating power dissipation, with multiple competing views and methods presented. Participants express varying degrees of confidence in their calculations and interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their assumptions, such as the constancy of resistance in light bulbs and the impact of firing angle on the waveform. There is also mention of the need for more precision in calculations, particularly regarding intermediate values.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying electrical engineering, particularly those interested in power electronics and the behavior of resistive loads in AC circuits.

steviespark
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A triac is used in a dimmer switch to control a 100W light bulb. If the firing angle is set for α=∏/3 estimate the power dissipated in the bulb Rated at 100W and the voltage source 230V @ 50Hz.

Homework Equations



Vpeak = Vrms/0.707

The Attempt at a Solution



Vpeak = 230/0.707 = 325V

Vload = 325 * √((2∏-(2*∏/3) + sin(2∏/3))/4∏)

Vload = 206Vrms


100W = 230 * I

I = 100/230

I = 0.43A

power dissipated = 206 * 0.43 = 88.6 Watts

Could someone please let me know if I'm on the right track? Or give me a nudge in the right direction? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
steviespark said:

Homework Statement



A triac is used in a dimmer switch to control a 100W light bulb. If the firing angle is set for α=∏/3 estimate the power dissipated in the bulb Rated at 100W and the voltage source 230V @ 50Hz.

Homework Equations



Vpeak = Vrms/0.707

The Attempt at a Solution



Vpeak = 230/0.707 = 325V

Vload = 325 * √((2∏-(2*∏/3) + sin(2∏/3))/4∏)

Vload = 206Vrms


100W = 230 * I

I = 100/230

I = 0.43A

power dissipated = 206 * 0.43 = 88.6 Watts

Could someone please let me know if I'm on the right track? Or give me a nudge in the right direction? Thanks in advance

Hi steviespark; Welcome to Physics Forums.

You've made an assumption that the current will be the same for the two cases (at full conduction versus the new conditions where the conduction angle is limited). That won't be true; the RMS current will change when the RMS voltage changes. So... what remains constant (at least by approximation or assumption!) between the scenarios? (Hint: what property of a lightbulb causes power to be dissipated when current flows though it?)
 
Much appreciated Gneil,

V/I = R

230/0.43 = 534.884,

Calculate I for new Voltage:

V/R = I

206/534.884 = 0.386

Power Dissipated = 206 * 0.386 = 79.5 W

Is this correct?
 
Hello Steviespark,

How did you get this?

Vload = 325 * √((2∏-(2*∏/3) + sin(2∏/3))/4∏)?

I'm doing the same course and feel stuck many times.
 
steviespark said:
Much appreciated Gneil,

V/I = R

230/0.43 = 534.884,

Calculate I for new Voltage:

V/R = I

206/534.884 = 0.386

Power Dissipated = 206 * 0.386 = 79.5 W

Is this correct?

The method appears to be correct, but you should keep more decimal places in intermediate results. In particular, use a couple more decimal places for your current value.
 
bizuputyi said:
Hello Steviespark,

How did you get this?

Vload = 325 * √((2∏-(2*∏/3) + sin(2∏/3))/4∏)?

I'm doing the same course and feel stuck many times.

Hi bizuputyi, Welcome to Physics Forums.

One approach would be to perform the integration for the power for the given waveform.
 
Thanks Gneill :)
 
Yes, he is the best.
Thank you Gneill.
 
P = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \frac{V_{rms}^2}{R}dt = \frac{1}{RT} \int_0^T V_{peak}^2 \sin^2(\omega t) dt= \frac{325^2}{2*529*0.02} \int_0^{0.02} 1+\cos(2*2*π*50 t) dt = 100W

That seems to be correct for an ordinary sine wave. How do I do the same with the firing angle included?
 
  • #10
Is it becoming something like:

P = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^{\frac{π}{3}} 0 dt + \frac{1}{T} \int_{\frac{π}{3}}^π \frac{V_{rms}^2}{R} dt + \frac{1}{T} \int_π^{\frac{4π}{3}} 0 dt + \frac{1}{T} \int_{\frac{4π}{3}}^{2π} \frac{V_{rms}^2}{R} dt?
 
  • #11
Yup, you set the integration limits to cover the conducting periods.

Note: I didn't verify your formula in detail, but the overall form looks right to me.
 
  • #12
Calculating with 50Hz I've got:

P = 2*\frac{V_{rms}^2}{2RT} \int_{0.00333}^{0.01} 1+\cos(2*2*π*50t) dt \approx 50W

Which is not correct I think as firing angle \frac{π}{2} would result in half power. I must have done something wrong.
 
  • #13
Okay, I've given in and taken a closer look at the setup.

You know, you can work strictly with the angular information. No need to muck about with the actual frequency and time periods. In angular terms the total period of a cycle is ##2\pi## radians. You integrate from ##\pi / 3## to ##5 \pi /3## to account for your firing angle. Since the argument of the integral consists of squared terms, you don't have to worry about positive versus negative half cycles.

Use the peak voltage in the calculation. The RMS value makes the assumption that the curve is a pure sinewave. With the firing angle active, it's not, and the RMS value of the new curve will be different. Using the peak value will sum the actual power dissipated.

Your starting integral should look something like:

$$\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_a^b \frac{E^2 sin(\theta)^2}{R} d\theta$$

Where a and b are the angular integration limits as set by the firing angle, and ##E## is ##\sqrt{2}\;E_{RMS}##.
 
  • #14
I totally get your drift and ended up with steviespark's result. Thank your for your effort to help!
 
  • #15
steviespark didn't carry enough digits in his calculations. A better result is 80.45 watts.

Also, as gneill said, you don't need to muck around with actual frequency and time periods; even more you don't need to involve the actual voltages and resistances. The result is simply the ratio of a couple of integrals times 100 watts:

attachment.php?attachmentid=72146&stc=1&d=1408011486.png


As an aside, in the real world, incandescent light bulbs don't have a constant resistance independent of applied voltage. Their resistance varies with temperature of the filament, which in turn changes quite a bit with dissipated power.
 

Attachments

  • TriacPower.png
    TriacPower.png
    1.7 KB · Views: 2,208
Last edited:
  • #16
That looks even more accurate then, great. I want to gain that thinking you guys have, hopefully I get there some day.
 
  • #17
I'm really stumped on this exact question.

What i have so far is.

I have found the peak voltage which makes sense as this gives the amplitude of the wave.

Vpeak= 325.269V

from this i find the equation for the voltage sine wave is:

325.269sin(x)V

I now need to find the average voltage of the circuit between pi/3 and pi

so intergrating

1/pi (integral) 325.269sin(x).dx gives:

-325.269cos(x)

inputting values for x of pi/3 and pi

[-325.269cos(pi)] - [-325.269cos(pi/3)]

[103.536] - [-51.725]

155.261V average between

returning this from, average value to peak value

155.261*rt2 =219.57V

Which is way higher than anyone elses values.

What have i done wrong?
 
  • #18
Just tried something different looking at other peoples solutions, but i have no idea why everyone is using sin^2? it makes no sense. the voltage wave is a sin wave. not a sin^2 wave.
 
  • #19
The_daddy_2012 said:
Just tried something different looking at other peoples solutions, but i have no idea why everyone is using sin^2? it makes no sense. the voltage wave is a sin wave. not a sin^2 wave.
The integral is solving for power dissipated over a cycle. Given voltage and resistance, what's the equation for power?
 
  • #20
V^2R=P

so V does equal 325.269sin(x) but it needs to be squared?

i can't see how R is found in this situation though?
 
  • #21
sorry correction V^2/R = P
 
  • #22
The_daddy_2012 said:
i can't see how R is found in this situation though?
What's the resistance of a 100W light bulb? You're given the working voltage (the mains source voltage).
 
  • #23
Seriously, how do you do that?

how can you look at an equation and say, hey, I am going to do it this way.

That method would never have occurred to me.

Thank you very much Gneill, a legend as always!
 
  • #24
gneill said:
$$\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_a^b \frac{E^2 sin(\theta)^2}{R} d\theta$$

Using this as a starting point,
b= 5π/3
a= π/3
R = V2/P = 2302 / 100 = 529Ω
Epeak = 325.269$$\frac{1}{2\pi * R} \int_{π/3}^{5π/3} E^2 sin(\theta)^2 d\theta$$

$$\frac{1}{2\pi R} E^2 \int_{π/3}^{5π/3} sin(\theta)^2 d\theta$$

sin2 A = ½ (1 - cos 2θ)

$$\frac{1}{2\pi R} E^2 \int_{π/3}^{5π/3} 1/2 (1 - cos 2θ) d\theta$$

1/(2π R) * E2 [ ½ (θ-sin 2θ)] π/35π/3

1/(2π 529) * 325.2692 [ ½ (5π/3 -sin (2 5π/3))] = 77.56W

1/(2π 529) * 325.2692 [ ½ (π/3 -sin (2 π/3))] = 15.5W

Any advice as to where it's starts going awry? Apologies for the formatting i don't know all the code.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
I think something's gone awry in your integration of cos2θ. The "2" in the argument makes a difference. Try performing the integration alone symbolically. What method will you use?
 
  • #26
gneill said:
I think something's gone awry in your integration of cos2θ. The "2" in the argument makes a difference. Try performing the integration alone symbolically. What method will you use?

0.5 * [x- (0.5 sin 2x)]

1/(2π R) * E2 * (0.5 [ θ-(0.5 sin 2θ)])
 
  • #27
Gremlin said:
0.5 * [x- (0.5 sin 2x)]

1/(2π R) * E2 * (0.5 [ θ-(0.5 sin 2θ)])
Okay.

By the way, you can use the x2 and x2 icons on the edit panel to create superscripts and subscripts.
 
  • #28
gneill said:
Okay.

By the way, you can use the x2 and x2 icons on the edit panel to create superscripts and subscripts.

Yes, scripts I've got the hang of, but i didn't need to use any in the post you quoted - and i say that as you phrased your comment like i should have used some.

That doesn't appear to solve the problem though as now I've got when θ = 5π/3:

3.0086 x 10-4 * 325.32 * (0.5 (5π/3 - (0.5 sin (2* 5π/3)))) = 81.8W

Which is not far from the right answer, but isn't the right answer and i haven't used θ = π/3, which is 16.38W.
 
  • #29
You need to plug in both end points. What you've derived is the indefinite integral (without the constant of integration). When you want to use it for a definite integral you need to plug both endpoint values into the indefinite integral and take the difference.
 
  • #30
gneill said:
You need to plug in both end points. What you've derived is the indefinite integral (without the constant of integration). When you want to use it for a definite integral you need to plug both endpoint values into the indefinite integral and take the difference.

Thanks.

Isn't that what I've done with a = π/3 and b = 5π/3? Arent they the end points and difference between then 81.8 - 16.38 = 65.42W? But that would be the wrong answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K