Triangle's contributory moment of inertia

Jellyf15h
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Triangle's contributory moment of inertia :D

Howdy.

I'm designing a 2-dimensional physics engine for use in games and simulations and have hit a roadblock.
The rotation system requires a value corresponding to the proportion between an object's regular inertia and its rotational inertia. EG, for a ring the proportion is 1, for a disc it's .5 evidently. Basically, <THIS> is what I'm after.

Anyway, what I need is an algorithm to find the average distance [not scaled] from a given point (x,y) to all points in the AREA of a triangle [(x1,y1), (x2,y2), (x3,y3)]. To say it differently, I need to find the average distance from all points within a given triangle to (x,y). Being in basic calculus [CURSE YOU PUBLIC EDUCATIONNNN] I'm not so familiar with integrals, so a solved algorithm is what I need.

Just to provide extra perspective, solid shapes will consist of multiple triangles [as it pertains to area, anyway.] and a weighted mean based on area will be used when computing their overall center of rotation and their average distribution. [what we're finding.] I plan to use the three-point formula for area and a trig algorithm to find the mass midpoint of each triangle. [If there's a way to do this without trig, tell me. Those tend to run faster.] There will be no variation in density in a triangle.

So, who among you is man enough to crack this nut?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please?

Pretty please? I'll be your friend. You'll get in the credits!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top