Trigonometry made more rational

AI Thread Summary
Rational trigonometry is gaining attention for simplifying complex problems traditionally associated with trigonometry, offering a more intuitive approach. The technique focuses on using squared distances to avoid square roots, which some argue makes it cumbersome and less mathematically valuable. Critics point out that it essentially rehashes concepts like dot and cross products without adding significant new insights. Despite the debate, there is appreciation for efforts to innovate and clarify mathematical concepts. Overall, the discussion highlights a desire for more accessible mathematics while recognizing the importance of traditional methods.
greg perry
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Trigonometry made more "rational"

I read an article the other day on "rational trigonometry" and decided to go exploring... and I feel as if a lightbulb has turned on. This seems like such a wonderful new technique to doing otherwise cumbersome problems, and I agree that it does feel like a more "rational approach" to the subject. I only wish this would have been available doing my university days, but am happy to see work being done to simplify what is often presented as a difficult and often cumbersome subject. Thank you to all mathematicians who make it their life's work to explore new and exciting paths... especially in the field of trigonemtry!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This silly "alternative" geometry which "rejects" the distance concept in favour of the squared distance (so that one avoids the square root) and other pointless substitutions has already been debated at PF somewhere, and is of no mathematical worth whatsoever.
 
Last edited:
Basically, the guy has rediscovered the notion of dot product and cross product, but has presented it in a more cumbersome form.

And yes, dot products and cross products are very nice things indeed. (But I wouldn't eschew trigonometry completely in their favor!)
 
Well, if you really think of it, Maths is a subjects of playing with sympols with logic and rational...the matter is how human find out the links between these and they are really great! And I think every of us will be as great as them too!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top