Triple integral, limits of integration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a triple integral of the function f(x,y,z) over a specified region defined by the inequalities x² + y² + z² ≤ 4, x ≤ 0, y ≤ 0, and z ≤ 0. The region is identified as one-eighth of a sphere with a radius of 2, prompting a consideration of spherical coordinates for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transition to spherical coordinates and the corresponding limits of integration. Questions arise regarding the algebraic determination of these limits, particularly the angle between the x and y axes. Some participants express confusion over the correctness of the proposed limits for r and the implications of symmetry in the context of the integrand.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering differing perspectives on the limits of integration and the appropriateness of using geometric intuition versus algebraic methods. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or limits, and various interpretations are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the symmetry of the integrand and the implications for the limits of integration in the context of the negative octant. There is a recognition that the limits for r must reflect the nature of the spherical coordinates and the specific region of integration.

Gauss M.D.
Messages
151
Reaction score
1
Pretty general question.

Integrate f(x,y,z) dxdydz over the area defined by:

x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} \leq 4
x \leq 0
y \leq 0
z \leq 0

It is immidiately apparent that it is 1/8 of a sphere with r=2. So from that geometrical intuition we can do a variable substitution to spherical coordinates and use the following limits of integration.

0 < r < 2
0 < θ < pi/2
0 < σ < pi/2

Or something. What I'm wondering is: how would you go about finding these limits algebraically?? Let θ be the angle to the z axis and σ be the angle between the x and y-axis and you would get

0 < θ < pi/2

But how would you figure out the angle between x and y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss M.D. said:
Pretty general question.

Integrate f(x,y,z) dxdydz over the area defined by:

x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} \leq 4
x \leq 0
y \leq 0
z \leq 0

It is immidiately apparent that it is 1/8 of a sphere with r=2. So from that geometrical intuition we can do a variable substitution to spherical coordinates and use the following limits of integration.

0 < r < 2
0 < θ < pi/2
0 < σ < pi/2

Or something. What I'm wondering is: how would you go about finding these limits algebraically?? Let θ be the angle to the z axis and σ be the angle between the x and y-axis and you would get

0 < θ < pi/2

But how would you figure out the angle between x and y?

Spherical coordinates :

##x = rcosθsin \phi##
##y = rsinθsin \phi##
##z = rcos \phi##
##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2##
##|J| = r^2sin \phi##

For starters, your limits for r are incorrect. Check them again.
 
What? How are my limits for r incorrect?

x^2 + y^2 + z^2 < 2^2
r^2 < 2^2
r < 2
 
Gauss M.D. said:
What? How are my limits for r incorrect?

x^2 + y^2 + z^2 < 2^2
r^2 < 2^2
r < 2

##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2##

So you get ##r^2 ≤ 4## which implies that ##|r| ≤ 2##.
 
Gauss M.D. said:
Pretty general question.

Integrate f(x,y,z) dxdydz over the area defined by:

x^{2} + y^{2} + z^{2} \leq 4
x \leq 0
y \leq 0
z \leq 0

It is immidiately apparent that it is 1/8 of a sphere with r=2. So from that geometrical intuition we can do a variable substitution to spherical coordinates and use the following limits of integration.

0 < r < 2
0 < θ < pi/2
0 < σ < pi/2

No, you can't use those limits without knowing some kind of symmetry conditions on the integrand ##f(x,y,z)##. Changing to spherical coordinates is appropriate, but draw a 3d coordinate system and use it to figure out the appropriate ##(\rho,\phi,\theta)## limits for that back octant.
 
Gauss M.D. said:
It is immidiately apparent that it is 1/8 of a sphere with r=2. So from that geometrical intuition we can do a variable substitution to spherical coordinates and use the following limits of integration.

0 < r < 2
0 < θ < pi/2
0 < σ < pi/2

yes, as you say it's an octant, they're all the same, so you certainly can choose the "positive" octant and integrate to find the volume of that (if you don't already know the formula for the volume of a sphere! :wink:)
What I'm wondering is: how would you go about finding these limits algebraically?? Let θ be the angle to the z axis and σ be the angle between the x and y-axis and you would get

0 < θ < pi/2

But how would you figure out the angle between x and y?

isn't it obviously π/2 ? and haven't you already written 0 < σ < π/2 ? :confused:

(perhaps I'm misunderstanding your question)​

as an exercise, what do you think the limits are for the given ("negative") octant? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
yes, as you say it's an octant, they're all the same, so you certainly can choose the "positive" octant and integrate to find the volume of that (if you don't already know the formula for the volume of a sphere! :wink:)

But they aren't all the same unless you have special properties in the integrand ##f(x,y,z)##.
 
Zondrina said:
##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2##

So you get ##r^2 ≤ 4## which implies that ##|r| ≤ 2##.

But it's a radius. It doesn't have a negative radius.
 
tiny-tim said:
yes, as you say it's an octant, they're all the same, so you certainly can choose the "positive" octant and integrate to find the volume of that (if you don't already know the formula for the volume of a sphere! :wink:)


isn't it obviously π/2 ? and haven't you already written 0 < σ < π/2 ? :confused:

(perhaps I'm misunderstanding your question)​

as an exercise, what do you think the limits are for the given ("negative") octant? :smile:


Well yes it is obvious if you appeal to geometric intuition, I just wanted to know if there was a way to do it algebraically.
 
  • #10
Gauss M.D. said:
Well yes it is obvious if you appeal to geometric intuition,

and if you ignore the fact that you can't do it that way.
 
  • #11
Gauss M.D. said:
Well yes it is obvious if you appeal to geometric intuition, I just wanted to know if there was a way to do it algebraically.

Sorry, but I've no idea what you mean by "algebraically". :confused:

How could the angle between x and y be anything other than π/2 ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K