Triton Nucleus & C14: Radiogenic Properties & Instability

  • Thread starter Thread starter rieman zeta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nucleus
rieman zeta
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
To all: In some detail what makes the tritium isotope of hydrogen radiogenic?

And since C12 and C13 are both stable what makes C14 unstable?

Thanks
Rieman Zeta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rieman zeta said:
To all: In some detail what makes the tritium isotope of hydrogen radiogenic?

And since C12 and C13 are both stable what makes C14 unstable?

Thanks
Rieman Zeta
In both cases and excess of neutrons!

T has 1 p and 2n. In the deuteron, the pn combination is fairly stable, but adding one more neutron pnn allows for less stability.

Similarly for C14, 6p+8n, versus 6p6n or 6p7n, in C12 and C13, respectively.
 
Thank you for your reply. I was hoping for a connection to some underlying principle. For example, if you add the right number of neutrons then stability ensues. The wrong number and you get instability.

What is the right and wrong #s criterion.

Perhaps it could be approached through the semi-empirical formula or quark theory?

The former I have a some and the latter only superficial knowledge.

Rieman Zeta
 
rieman zeta said:
Thank you for your reply. I was hoping for a connection to some underlying principle. For example, if you add the right number of neutrons then stability ensues. The wrong number and you get instability.
Well there is that. There is more or less a stability band. On either side, one finds a radionuclide, but its not very straightforward. To few neutrons will usually lead to positron emission or electron capture. To many neutrons will lead to beta or alpha decay, but alpha decay is restricted to the heavy elements from Bi on up (Bi 210 is the lightest nuclide to undergo spontaneous alpha emission).

One can find the chart of nuclides here - http://wwwndc.tokai.jaeri.go.jp/CN04/index.html

rieman zeta said:
Perhaps it could be approached through the semi-empirical formula or quark theory?
I'll get back to you on that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top