Trouble following the derivation of Scott and Viner 1965

  • Thread starter Thread starter achmorrison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
achmorrison
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been reading the Scott and Viner AJP paper from 1965 "The Geometrical Appearance of Large Objects Moving at Relativistic Speeds" and I am having a little trouble following their derivation of the expression for x in the appendix of the paper.

I understand how they get the expression for t:

t = -[(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}-d]/c

Which they put into the Lorentz transformation for x':

x'=\gamma(x-vt)=\gamma[x+\beta[(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2)^{1/2}-d]]

But, then they say that they want to get an expression for x, y, z in terms of x',y',z' which implies that they just solve the above expression for x. But, when I do that, I don't get anything at all like what they get.

I have looked at dozens of papers that reference this one and they all just start with Scott and Viner's results with no discussion of how they get there.

I feel like I'm missing something very simple, but I just don't see it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't read the paper, but it sounds to me like you're trying to find the inverse of a matrix (or equivalently: solve a system of equations) by only looking at one of the rows (one of the equations).
 
Right, that's what I'm trying to do, but I don't get their result:

x= \gamma((x'+\gamma\beta d)-\beta[(x'+\gamma\beta d)^2+y'^2+(z'-d)^2]^{1/2})
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top