Trouble with calculating 3 Phase Power

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating power in a three-phase system using a scope with a current clamp and voltage probe. The user is uncertain about the correct method for measuring power, particularly regarding the voltage probe's connection to line-line versus line-neutral. It is clarified that if the voltage is measured line-line, the power reading must be adjusted by multiplying by the square root of three to obtain total power. Additionally, the phase angle may be affected by the measurement method, potentially leading to an erroneous power factor reading. The consensus is that for accurate results, measurements should ideally reference neutral, especially for balanced loads.
roro36
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I think I am correct, but just wanted to check. We have some furnaces and I want to work out what power they run at. I have a scope with a current clamp and voltage probe. I have set the scope to read out power and power factor. That is where my problem lies, I think. I should have set it to voltage and pf and read the current off an aditional meter? In any event. It has worked out the power for me. What I want to know, is what is this power value referring to? I attached a drawing that I have used to try and understand it in my head.

Because I have connected the voltage probe to read Line-Line, ie ~400V, the power that it is reading is effectively P=VI*pf.. But it is a 3 phase system. So because I set the voltage probe acoss Line-Line, I need to multiply this Power value by root3 to get the power of the machine. If i had set the voltage probe to read Line-Neutral, I would multiply the power reading by 3? I know I have assume equal currents and that the meter is working out single phase Power I think, the setting just says Power and says Voltage Probe A, Current Probe B.

Please let me know if this correct.
 

Attachments

  • Power.jpg
    Power.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 569
Engineering news on Phys.org
Without knowing the specifics of you scope/meter I think that you may get an anomalous power factor reading due to the voltage measurement being line to line. That is, (unless the scope/meter somehow knows this and is correcting for it), the line to line voltage measurement will throw off the phase angle by 30 degrees.

If you have L1,L2,L3 labeled correctly in that phase sequence, then your voltage measurement will lead by 30 degrees, giving a reported power factor of 0.866 (current lagging) even if the actual power factor was unity!

I think you'd need to first correct for this error in the reported pf and then multiply by sqrt(3) to get the total power, assuming a balanced load of course.
 
So to be specific, with you're example measurements of 400V 120A and pf=0.8. I would calculate the true phase angle as \cos^{-1}(0.8) - 30 = 6.9 degrees, and hence find the true power factor of about 0.99.

Using these value I get a total 3 phase power of approx 82KW as opposed to the 66kW you calculate.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I understand what you are saying. It would then be best to redo the test making sure the probe was referenced from Neutral. Would it make any difference if it were referenced to earth?
 
If the phases are balanced, ie equal currents in all 3,
then
kva 3 phase = Vline X Iline X sqrt(3)
and kw = kva X pf
and at unity pf there'll be 30 degrees between line-to-line volts and line amps

an oven i would expect to be resistive hence unity pf

do your measurements look like a balanced resistive load?
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K