Troubleshooting Amplitude Discrepancies in Active LPF: Sallen Key Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter hemant03
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around troubleshooting amplitude discrepancies in a four-pole active low-pass filter (LPF) using a Sallen-Key design. The user notes that the amplitudes of Vs1 and Vs2 exceed the input signal amplitude, despite calculations suggesting otherwise. Factors such as gain from resistors R5, R6, R7, and R8, as well as potential positive feedback from the op-amp, are highlighted as contributors to this unexpected behavior. Additionally, the DC shift observed in Vs1 and Vs2 is attributed to the circuit being DC coupled and the input square wave's duty cycle not being perfectly balanced. Overall, careful attention to resistor values and circuit stability is crucial in achieving the desired filter performance.
hemant03
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a 4 pole active LPF.
I am seeing that the amplitude of Vs1 & Vs2 is higher than the amplitude of input signal.
I am not sure how.
In my calculation, I have taken the amplitude of the fundamental harmonic of the square wave (input) into consideration, reduce it by 6db and multiply by the gain. The amplitude results don't quite match up with what I see in simulation (JPEG of the circuit and waveform attached).
Also, I am assuming that the output of the 1st stage (Vs1) is a triangular wave, so that I am considering the fundamental harmonic of a triangular for the calculation of amplitude of the 2nd stage (Vs2).
The other thing that I don't understand is how come Vs1 and Vs2 are shifted up by some DC value. Does capacitor charging/discharging has got something to do with it?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Question LPF.jpg
    Question LPF.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 422
  • Waveform_LPF.jpg
    Waveform_LPF.jpg
    36.9 KB · Views: 406
Engineering news on Phys.org
You do have some gain because of R5, R6, R7 and R8. Those are for adjusting the "d" of the filter, but it also have a little bit of gain. Also, there is some sort of positive feedback from the output of the opamp back to the input area. You expect some sort of peak in the pass band and the amplitude goes up some also.

The of R5 and R6, R7 and R8 are very sensitive. You change the kind of filter just by changing the ratio. You have to be particular careful when R5 and R6 come close to equal ( the op-amp has gain approach 2) it gets very touchy. Anything over that, it will burst into oscillation. Even when it get close to 2, it is very touchy. I just use this filter in my guitar electronics design two weeks ago, I got gain close to 2, every time I power up or power down, it gave me a "beep" sound. That is conditionally stable!

regarding DC, it is a DC coupled circuit. If your square wave is not perfect 50% duty cycle, you are going to have an offset( DC shift).

there is another thread on this that goes into detail analysis of this kind of filter, only difference is they concentrated on the op-amp being only a voltage follower. This is one of the very few circuit I am not interested in going into detail as the application is very straight forward but the analysis is quite long.
 
Last edited:
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...

Similar threads

Back
Top