Troubleshooting Mandl & Shaw QFT: Deriving eqn (9.94) on pg 192 of 2nd edition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vic Sandler
  • Start date Start date
Vic Sandler
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
I tried to derive eqn (9.94) on page 192 of the second edition of Mandl and Shaw QFT and failed. Can someone help me see what I am doing wrong?

Ignoring factors that do not change from eqn (9.92) to eqn (9.94), noting that f(k) has been set to 1, and dropping terms linear in k and k squared as described in the text, I get:

\frac{\gamma^{\alpha}(\not{p'}+m)\gamma^{\mu}(\not{p}+m)\gamma_{\alpha}}{((p'-k)^2 - m^2)((p-k)^2 - m^2)}

= \gamma^{\mu}\frac{(-2p'p)}{(-2p'k)(-2pk)} + \frac{4m(p' + p)^{\mu}}{(-2p'k)(-2pk)} + \gamma^{\mu}\frac{(-2m^2)}{(-2p'k)(-2pk)}

The first term on the right hand side is the same as in the book, but divided by -2. Perhaps the other two terms combine in some way to fix it up, but I don't see it. I also don't see what terms are meant by the author when he says "the dots indicate terms which are finite in the limit \lambda \rightarrow 0" since none of the terms involve \lambda.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let us see only the p/ . p'/ term.
γα/p'γμ/pγα=[-/p'γα+2p'αμα(-/p)+2pα),now /p and /p' operating on free particles states will give m which will cancel with the m already written in (/p+m) and (/p'+m) terms.You are left with
2p'αγμ2pα,so you will get 4 in the numerator not 2.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks Andrien, that helps a lot. But it still leaves the middle term:

\frac{4m(p' + p)^{\mu}}{(-2p'k)(-2pk)}

Do you have any ideas about it?
 
There are no such terms because as I have written earlier owing to -/p(-/p') acting on free particle spinor you get a factor of -m which will cancel with m in (/p -/k +m) and also dropping linear terms and quadratic terms in k,you are left only with the first term already written in the book.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top