Troubleshooting nuclear decay, electron binding energies, internal contributions

Graham87
Messages
72
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
See pic
Relevant Equations
See pic
How do you know which binding energy shell to use? In the solution it uses K and L2. Why specifically L2 and not L3 or L1 for example?

And what should I do with the information to omit electrons lower than 20kev? I initially thought that meant to omit the electron binding energies lower than 20kev. But L2 which is lower than 20kev is included, so which expression represents electron energy? If it is ΔE - B(L) then shouldn’t L3 be included since it also has a higher energy than 20kev?

1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess is that there are some typos as indicated below:
1683822652238.png

The ##L_1## should be ##K## and the ##L_2##'s should just be ##L##. This corresponds with the given binding energies:

1683822987537.png


Perhaps the value ##B(L)_{Hg} = 14.2087## keV is a weighted average over the ##L_1##, ##L_2##, and ##L_3## levels.

I'm not sure about the 20 keV restriction. Since ##\overline E_\beta##, ##B(K)_{Hg}## and ##B(L)_{Hg}## are all in the hundreds of keV, there doesn't appear to be any need to worry about requiring the electrons to have an energy greater than 20 keV.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top