True or false: Differentiability with vectors

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
Justhanging
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
If all the first partial derivatives of f exist at [tex]\vec{x}[/tex], and if [tex] \lim_{\vec{h}\rightarrow\vec{0}}\frac {f(\vec{x})-(\nabla f(\vec{x}))\cdot\vec{h}}{||\vec{h}||} = 0 [/tex]

Then f is differentiable at [tex]\vec{x}[/tex]

Note: Its the magnitude of h on the bottom.

First of all, I don't exactly understand what a function of a vector is like f([tex]\vec{x}[/tex]). Does it mean that this function is evaluated at the terminal point of this vector?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
LCKurtz said:
Just guessing trying to fix your TeX for you:

[tex]\lim_{\vec{h}\rightarrow\vec{0}}\frac {f(\vec{x})-(\nabla f(\vec{x}))\cdot\vec{h}}{|\vec{h}|} = 0[/tex]

Click on it to see it.

You sure know your latex, sorry its my first time and it was late. Everything is right except its the magnitude of h on the bottom not the absolute value. I don't if the notation is the same.
 
Yes, say the vector x has components (1,-4,3). Then f(x) = f(1,-4,3). And yes, the absolute value notation, |h|, is often used instead of ||h|| to mean the magnitude of a vector.
 
HallsofIvy said:
First, do you understand what [itex]\nabla\vec{f}[/itex] [means?

And what is your definition of "differentiable" for a vector valued function of 3 variables?

Yes it means the gradient of f evaluated at the terminal point of the vector.

My equation for differentiability taken from the book is:

[tex] \lim_{(\Delta x, \Delta y)\rightarrow\ (0,0)}\frac {\Delta f - f_x (x_0, y_0)\Delta x - f_y(x_0,y_0) \Delta y}{\sqrt{(\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2}} = 0[/tex]

If [tex]\vec{h}[/tex] is taken to be [tex](\Delta x, \Delta y)[/tex] than the dot product of h and the gradient evaluated at the vector x is:

[tex] f_x (\vec{x}) \Delta x + f_y(\vec{x}) \Delta y [/tex]

Then

[tex] \lim_{(\Delta x, \Delta y)\rightarrow\ (0,0)}\frac {f(\vec{x}) - f_x (\vec{x})\Delta x - f_y(\vec{x}) \Delta y}{\sqrt{(\Delta x)^2 + (\Delta y)^2}} = 0<br /> [/tex]

I distributed the minus from the original problem but am not exactly sure if I can. It looks very similar to the definition with the exception of deltaF being missing. Is this the only reason why the statement is false? I don't exactly understand the deltaF concept as being approximately [tex]f_x (\vec{x}) \Delta x + f_y(\vec{x}) \Delta y[/tex]
 
Last edited: