Truss Bridges: Strength Explained

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyRay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Truss bridges derive their strength from the triangular configuration of their structural members. Each member is supported by two other members, creating a system where forces are evenly distributed and resist deformation. Unlike rectangles, which can collapse under lateral forces due to angle distortion without length change, triangles maintain their shape under stress, making them inherently stable. This structural integrity is crucial for the overall performance and safety of truss bridges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic structural engineering principles
  • Familiarity with truss design and analysis
  • Knowledge of force distribution in engineering
  • Concept of geometric stability in shapes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of truss design in civil engineering
  • Explore the mechanics of materials and stress analysis
  • Study the differences between triangular and rectangular structures in engineering
  • Learn about the applications of truss bridges in modern infrastructure
USEFUL FOR

Civil engineers, architecture students, and anyone interested in structural design and the mechanics of materials will benefit from this discussion.

JimmyRay
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
What makes truss bridges so strong? Like if you have something supported by triangles, why is it good? I don't really understand the physics behind it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you must look at the entire structure itself to understand. each member is supported by teo other members whose stress is oppisite the one being supported
 
A truss bridge gains it's strength from the numerous triangular forms contained in it's structure. Were the structural members of the span arranged in rectangles instead of triangles, the bridge would be weak and collapse. This is because in a rectangle, a lateral force can change the angles without changing the lengths of any of the sides (the beams), allowing the rectangle to collapse without any compressive or tension forces to resist the collapse.

But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?) you cannot change the angles without changing the lengths of the sides. So the beams push back on any force that tries to change their shape. Since the triangle has the least number of angles of any odd sided figure, even a small change in angle would require a large change in side length, resulting in a large resistive force.
 
Bob3141592 said:
But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?)
Nope. Stick with triangles.

Build a pentagon from straws. You can easily distort its angles without any change in the length of its sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K