Trying to design Wind Turbine Blades

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of wind turbine blades, specifically utilizing Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) with corrections for tip loss and other factors. Participants are exploring the necessary calculations, assumptions, and iterative processes involved in determining blade characteristics such as chord distribution, lift and drag coefficients, and Reynolds number.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks guidance on how to assign a value to the chord length needed for calculating the Reynolds number.
  • Another participant suggests assuming a chord distribution and iterating based on the results to find a feasible design.
  • A clarification is made regarding the terminology, emphasizing the distinction between BEMT and BEM.
  • A participant shares detailed data and results from their calculations, including various aerodynamic parameters and coefficients related to the blade design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the iterative nature of the design process and the need to assume a chord distribution, but no consensus is reached on specific values or methods for the chord length or other parameters.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions regarding aerodynamic factors, and the iterative process is highlighted as a key aspect of the design methodology. Specific values and results shared may depend on the chosen chord distribution and other design parameters.

jonagad
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Blade Element Momentum
Relevant Equations
Reynolds numer:
Re=((V)*(ρ)*(c))/μ
Where:
V:wind velocity
ρ: density
c: chord
μ: Dynamic viscosity
Hello, I'm trying to follow the instructions from the book "Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines"-Martin O.L. Hansen, to design a blade, the method it's the BEM accounting for the tip loss (Prandtl) and Glauert corrections, but I can't get it right, for the Cl (lift coefficient) and Cd (drag coefficient) I need the Reynolds number, but in order to calculate de Re, I need the chord, how can I give a value to the chord?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
 
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)
 
Arjan82 said:
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
Ohh, I see, that´s exactly what I was doubting, thank you for responding, i will do that.

This is what I have, if you want to check it out:
Data:
a: Axial Induction factor
a´: Angular induction factor
Both a and a´ usually are =0 initially.
Then it´s an iterative process
U_1=5.17m/s
Ω=25rpm2.61799388rad/s
R=1.25m
B=3
a_c=0.2
Results:
AirfoilS823S823S823S822S822S822S822S822
No12345678
Section0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
a=0.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.199999
a´=00000000
r=0.250.3750.50.6250.750.87511.125
λ_r=0.126595450.189893170.25319090.316488620.379786350.443084070.506381790.56967952
tanφ=6.319350414.212900273.15967522.527740162.106450141.805528691.57983761.40430009
φ=1.413853591.337743211.264282191.194079911.12756641.06499871.006481690.95199662
f=6.07465913.597248682.359996671.613115581.106964680.734871670.443810430.2046056
F=0.99853550.982555070.939800340.872288560.785524250.681587490.556552640.39350817
α(°)=8.98.98.99.39.39.39.39.3
α(rad)=0.15533430.15533430.15533430.162315620.162315620.162315620.162315620.16231562
θ_p=1.258519291.182408911.108947891.031764290.965250780.902683080.844166070.789681
C_l1.21.21.211111
C_d0.0180.0180.0180.010.010.010.010.01
C_n0.205337880.294652390.379245540.377167910.437893230.493253230.54328640.5882036
C_t1.182438311.16340191.138638140.926198880.89908260.869943250.839606990.80877471
supposed chord=0.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.3
σ=0.57295780.381971860.28647890.229183120.190985930.163702230.143239450.12732395
K=33.120011333.057554331.450295334.902325430.660727525.83824520.4240713.9456387
a (if≤a_c)=0.031133240.03119390.03284040.02949650.033714610.040260490.051482520.07724609
a (if>a_c)=-0.014839980.028547770.029921870.027118490.030646570.035968280.044683980.06296168
a´=-11.12852991.012833760.431917720.216319250.1642240.140566920.13577140.16071096
dF_N=0.58509770.432562060.577875660.608327260.741833540.879084531.013705671.11762702
dQ=3.369285471.707922751.735000681.493849351.5231331.550428071.566603481.53672719
dr=0.250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.125
U_rel=5.071369575.147896745.244662675.395874925.530058395.672061745.803662125.85659519
dF_T=4.492380631.518153551.156667120.796719650.6769480.590639260.522201160.45532658
dF_L=1.139775480.587216770.609500290.537627280.564698950.59407250.621959050.6333561
dF_D=0.017096630.008808250.00914250.005376270.005646990.005940720.006219590.00633356
 
Of course, thank you
Arjan82 said:
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K