Trying to design Wind Turbine Blades

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the design of wind turbine blades using the Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) as outlined in "Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines" by Martin O.L. Hansen. The user seeks guidance on determining the chord length necessary for calculating the Reynolds number, which is critical for deriving the lift coefficient (Cl) and drag coefficient (Cd). The iterative design process involves assuming a chord distribution and adjusting it based on feasibility and performance outcomes. Key parameters discussed include axial induction factor (a), angular induction factor (a'), and various aerodynamic coefficients.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT)
  • Familiarity with aerodynamic coefficients such as lift coefficient (Cl) and drag coefficient (Cd)
  • Knowledge of Reynolds number calculation and its significance in aerodynamics
  • Experience with iterative design processes in engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research chord distribution methods for wind turbine blade design
  • Learn about Reynolds number calculation and its impact on aerodynamic performance
  • Explore advanced aerodynamic modeling techniques for wind turbines
  • Investigate software tools for simulating wind turbine performance, such as XFOIL or ANSYS Fluent
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, aerodynamicists, and researchers involved in wind turbine design and optimization, as well as students studying renewable energy technologies.

jonagad
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Blade Element Momentum
Relevant Equations
Reynolds numer:
Re=((V)*(ρ)*(c))/μ
Where:
V:wind velocity
ρ: density
c: chord
μ: Dynamic viscosity
Hello, I'm trying to follow the instructions from the book "Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines"-Martin O.L. Hansen, to design a blade, the method it's the BEM accounting for the tip loss (Prandtl) and Glauert corrections, but I can't get it right, for the Cl (lift coefficient) and Cd (drag coefficient) I need the Reynolds number, but in order to calculate de Re, I need the chord, how can I give a value to the chord?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
 
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)
 
Arjan82 said:
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
Ohh, I see, that´s exactly what I was doubting, thank you for responding, i will do that.

This is what I have, if you want to check it out:
Data:
a: Axial Induction factor
a´: Angular induction factor
Both a and a´ usually are =0 initially.
Then it´s an iterative process
U_1=5.17m/s
Ω=25rpm2.61799388rad/s
R=1.25m
B=3
a_c=0.2
Results:
AirfoilS823S823S823S822S822S822S822S822
No12345678
Section0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
a=0.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.199999
a´=00000000
r=0.250.3750.50.6250.750.87511.125
λ_r=0.126595450.189893170.25319090.316488620.379786350.443084070.506381790.56967952
tanφ=6.319350414.212900273.15967522.527740162.106450141.805528691.57983761.40430009
φ=1.413853591.337743211.264282191.194079911.12756641.06499871.006481690.95199662
f=6.07465913.597248682.359996671.613115581.106964680.734871670.443810430.2046056
F=0.99853550.982555070.939800340.872288560.785524250.681587490.556552640.39350817
α(°)=8.98.98.99.39.39.39.39.3
α(rad)=0.15533430.15533430.15533430.162315620.162315620.162315620.162315620.16231562
θ_p=1.258519291.182408911.108947891.031764290.965250780.902683080.844166070.789681
C_l1.21.21.211111
C_d0.0180.0180.0180.010.010.010.010.01
C_n0.205337880.294652390.379245540.377167910.437893230.493253230.54328640.5882036
C_t1.182438311.16340191.138638140.926198880.89908260.869943250.839606990.80877471
supposed chord=0.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.3
σ=0.57295780.381971860.28647890.229183120.190985930.163702230.143239450.12732395
K=33.120011333.057554331.450295334.902325430.660727525.83824520.4240713.9456387
a (if≤a_c)=0.031133240.03119390.03284040.02949650.033714610.040260490.051482520.07724609
a (if>a_c)=-0.014839980.028547770.029921870.027118490.030646570.035968280.044683980.06296168
a´=-11.12852991.012833760.431917720.216319250.1642240.140566920.13577140.16071096
dF_N=0.58509770.432562060.577875660.608327260.741833540.879084531.013705671.11762702
dQ=3.369285471.707922751.735000681.493849351.5231331.550428071.566603481.53672719
dr=0.250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.125
U_rel=5.071369575.147896745.244662675.395874925.530058395.672061745.803662125.85659519
dF_T=4.492380631.518153551.156667120.796719650.6769480.590639260.522201160.45532658
dF_L=1.139775480.587216770.609500290.537627280.564698950.59407250.621959050.6333561
dF_D=0.017096630.008808250.00914250.005376270.005646990.005940720.006219590.00633356
 
Of course, thank you
Arjan82 said:
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
5K