Trying to Develop a Decryption Scheme for a Given Encryption

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWElbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Encryption
BWElbert
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello PF friends!

Earlier this week a friend of mine (both of us are in the same mathematics department) posed an encryption mapping to me and I have thus far not been able to solve it. Here's the map of the k+1 layer:

\lambda_n^{k+1} = (\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lambda_i^{k})\; mod\; 27,

where \lambda_i^{k} is the numerical representation (A=0,B=1,...,' '=27) of the ith letter of the kth layer.

Clearly this encryption is punctuation-free and does not act on numbers. Let me show you what the process looks like:

Plaintext: H-E-L-L-O T-H-E-R-E
# Repr. : 7-4-11-11-14-26-19-7-4-17-4
Encrypt : 7-11-22-6-20-19-11-18-22-12-16

So far, I have shown that because the first number in the code never changes, determining the second letter reduces to solving a modular equation if we know how deeply encrypted the data is (a requisite for decrypting this in full, I think).

The first part I am working on is trying to show if it is Uniquely Decipherable or not--I haven't found a counter-example to it, but am also not sure how to apply the theorems of Sardinas and Kraft to this code.

Finally, if it is uniquely decipherable, I wonder if this code is at best probabilistically decipherable.

Any insight or thoughts would be great...I don't want to work on writing an encryption algorithm if I can't find a way to decrypt it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I doubt it is uniquely decodable as ##\mathbb{Z}_{27}## has zero divisors. This should lead to problems.
First write the scheme in matrix form over this ring, which gives us a tool to deal with the problem. It looks as if it is a power of an upper triangular matrix. Decoding then means to invert this matrix, which is in general not possible in my opinion.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top