Trying to understand basic gravitation

  • Thread starter Thread starter U.Renko
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
Understanding gravity and orbital mechanics involves recognizing that celestial bodies like the Moon do not simply fall to Earth due to their horizontal velocity, which allows them to maintain an orbit. This horizontal component of velocity, combined with gravitational attraction, results in a continuous free-fall towards Earth while also moving forward, creating an elliptical or circular path. The initial conditions of the system, such as the Moon's velocity at formation, play a crucial role in establishing its orbit. Additionally, the Moon's formation remains somewhat mysterious, with theories suggesting it may have formed from debris after a collision with a proto-Moon. Overall, the interplay of initial velocity and gravitational forces explains why the Moon does not fall directly to Earth.
U.Renko
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
I have a bit of intuition on microscopic structures, so I "easily" understand things such as chemistry, nuclear and particle physics and the such. I'm no expert in these subject or anything but I do have a easier time learning it.

But I REALLY have a hard time understanding some macroscopical/astronomical structures.
But I intend to fix it.

Anyways, what I still don't understand about gravity is the circular/elliptical orbits of planets/satellites/stars/etc. This question might sound silly but...

Why don't the moon just falls on Earth? I understand it is constantly "falling" towards the Earth and all. What I mean is, why does it have a horizontal component of velocity which makes it "not really fall"? Is it because it had a initial velocity different than zero? Does it depends on the initial conditions of the system or something like that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi U.Renko! :smile:
U.Renko said:
Why don't the moon just falls on Earth? … why does it have a horizontal component of velocity which makes it "not really fall"? Is it because it had a initial velocity different than zero? Does it depends on the initial conditions of the system or something like that?

Yup, that's exactly it! :biggrin:

Anything that's orbiting anything else is doing so only because the initial conditions were right.

(Having said that, the formation of the Moon is actually a bit of a mystery … very likely, it happened when a proto-Moon in the same orbit as Earth "backed into" Earth … I suppose it must have done it with "sidespin", or the debris would just have gone straight up and down again?! :confused:)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top