Trying to understand the relationship between Newtons, Joules and Work

AI Thread Summary
A force of 1 Newton applied over 3 meters results in 3 joules of energy. This energy is used to change the velocity of a 1 kg mass, but it does not equate to a final speed of 1 m/s. The kinetic energy can be calculated to determine the actual speed, which will differ from the initial assumption. Additionally, using the known force and mass allows for the calculation of acceleration and time, which can further clarify the motion. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate physics calculations.
phleaf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A force of 1 Newton times 3 meters, can that mean : a 1 kg mass pushed over 3 meters went from 0 to 1 m /s/s ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1 Newton x 1 meter = 1 joule

A joule is a measurement of energy. In your case, 1 Newton x 3 meters is 3 joules of energy.

Since you know the energy is 3 joules, what can you conclude about the velocity of a 1kg mass being pushed 3 meters.
 
3 joules were needed to change the velocity from 0 to 1 m/s ?
 
You did 3 Joules of work on the mass. Energy is conserved so you know what its kinetic energy is. You can calculate its speed from that... and it won’t be 1 m/sec.

Or you can calculate the acceleration (you know the force and the mass) and use the equation that relates distance, time, and acceleration to calculate the time it took for the mass to move 3 meters. Once you have the time you can calculate its speed... and it should agree with the other speed calculation.

This would be a really good time to Google for “SUVAT equations”
 
  • Like
Likes phleaf, vanhees71 and sophiecentaur
phleaf said:
0 to 1 m /s/s ?
Something wrong with your units there, I'm afraid - if you intended to describe uniform acceleration.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top