Trying to understand Work and Energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of work and energy, particularly in the context of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). Participants explore how work is defined, the forces involved in energy transfer, and the implications of these concepts in various scenarios, including falling objects and friction in toy cars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that work requires a force exerted on an object causing it to move, and that work done on a system adds energy to it, while work done by a system removes energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that when a box falls, a downward force is applied, resulting in work done on the box that increases its kinetic energy, and mentions that the falling box does work on the Earth.
  • A later reply questions whether the car toy can be seen as doing work on the ground, suggesting that friction is the only force doing work against the car's motion.
  • One participant introduces the idea that kinetic energy is not absolute and can depend on the reference frame, proposing that in a moving reference frame, the car can do work on the ground, removing energy from it.
  • It is mentioned that the energy lost due to friction appears as heat, and that the work done by the car on the ground can be considered negative when it slows down the ground.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of work done by systems, particularly regarding whether a system can do work on itself and how to interpret energy transfer in various contexts. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions of work and energy, the role of reference frames in kinetic energy, and the implications of Newton's Third Law in the context of self-work.

Jazz
Messages
103
Reaction score
5
I understand that:

1) For work to be done there must be a force (or a component of it) exerted upon an object, causing it to move. Work done on a system puts energy into it.

2) If the force is applied in the opposite direction to that of the object’s displacement, then the work done by that force removes energy from it.

3) If work is done by a system, energy is removed from it as well.

But here is where I get confused:

If I put a box on a table, it gains PE. If I let it fall from that height, it will lose its PE. My question is, when falling what force in the upward direction is being applied to the box, removing energy from it? On what is my system (the box) doing work?

My textbook asks for giving an example where the work done by the system removes energy from it. I've been thinking in a car toy after having pushed it. It’s easy to think about it as friction doing work on the car with a direction opposite to its motion, and hence removing KE from it; but if my system is the car toy, on what is this doing work? On the ground?

And ultimately (and my today’s silly question), Can a system do work on itself? I guess it can’t, because Newton’s Third Law would be violated. If this conclusion isn’t wrong, then what about the act of eating? A person eating is putting energy on themselves, but how is this interpreted in the context of work?

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the box on your table falls, a downward force is applied to your box and your box moves downward. As a result work was done on your box and it gains kinetic energy. Associate work not with potential energy or energy in general, but rather specifically with kinetic energy. As an aside, your falling box is also doing work on the Earth while it is falling.
 
DocZaius said:
When the box on your table falls, a downward force is applied to your box and your box moves downward. As a result work was done on your box and it gains kinetic energy. Associate work not with potential energy or energy in general, but rather specifically with kinetic energy. As an aside, your falling box is also doing work on the Earth while it is falling.

Aah, true.

About the car toy, the only work done is by friction against its motion, right? Can there be an explanation where the car is the thing doing work on something (like the ground) removing energy from it?
 
Kinetic energy is not an invariant (aka absolute) quantity. It depends on your choice of reference frame. If you choose a reference frame in which the ground is moving and in which the car is [initially] at rest then friction between the two will remove energy from the ground while imparting energy to the car.

There is an invariant quantity here -- the difference between the total starting kinetic energy and the total ending kinetic energy does not depend on the choice of reference frame. This lost kinetic energy appears as heat due to the friction.

Note that when the car slows the ground down, the amount of work it is doing on the ground is negative.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K