Turbine Q: Feeding Air or Steam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfd43tg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Turbine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of using air versus steam as working fluids in turbines. Participants explore the mechanics of turbine operation, energy transfer, and design considerations, touching on theoretical and practical aspects of turbine technology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the practicality of using air in turbines, noting that while air can be used, it requires energy input to create flow, unlike steam which can be generated through boiling water.
  • Others argue that turbines are optimized for specific working fluids, with steam turbines benefiting from thermodynamic cycles that involve phase changes, which air does not provide.
  • A participant suggests that while steam has a higher energy transfer potential, air could lead to simpler systems, proposing a design that may require collaboration for evaluation.
  • There is a discussion about the energy dynamics in turbines, with some emphasizing that turbines must maintain rotation to be efficient and that the energy extracted is contingent upon the flow of the working fluid.
  • Some participants highlight the differences between various types of turbines, such as gas turbines and wind turbines, and the challenges of heating air to achieve high power levels.
  • Compressed air vehicles are mentioned as a practical application of air-powered systems, indicating that such technologies exist.
  • Concerns are raised about the design and operational considerations when comparing turbines using air versus steam, including material handling, equipment size, and heat transfer efficiency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the viability of using air versus steam in turbines, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the implications of each choice. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal working fluid for turbine applications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions about energy input requirements, the efficiency of different turbine designs, and the thermodynamic advantages of phase changes in steam versus the challenges of using air.

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
948
Reaction score
48
I know this will sound stupid, but what would happen if you just fed air into a turbine? Doesn't it derive energy from the rotation? Why do people run steam through a turbine? Sounds like a wind mill.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you boil water for steam in a closed vessel with a small opening, then the steam rushes out the opening and through the turbine or whatever you want to turn or push. You are quite correct that you can use any gas with a turbine - you just have to get it moving.
 
It may not be as elementary as stated. Strictly speaking a turbine is a device that extracts force from a moving fluid and produces torque on a shaft to be used in another form. The form of a steam turbine is optimized for the flow conditions experienced. A water turbine from a hydroelectric plant is also optimized for it's expected conditions. Even a windmill is a form of a turbine, modern ones being likewise optimized.
The turbine portion of a Gas turbine engine is running in a very hot high velocity gas. If you could recreate the same conditions in air it would work equally well. However if you have no ready source for your fluid creating the appropriate flow can be very energy intensive.

The energy is not derived from the rotation. The Turbine must stay rotating at the designed speed to be efficient and continue to rotate. One can only extract the power over and above that needed to continue rotation. Conversely if you need a specific amount of power the flow of fluid must be increased until a state of equilibrium is reached.
 
A turbine extracts energy from its working fluid, you need to put energy into the working fluid, a boiler is a fairly simple way to putt energy into water. If you wanted to use air as your working fluid you'd have to compress it with machines driven by another machine. Imagine an air compressor attached to an internal combustion engine using the air to turn a turbine attached to a generator, you might as well attach the ic engine straight onto the generator.
 
I would think steam carries a larger energy transfer potential, but air only will produce a much simpler system. If you will allow, I might be willing to suggest a design that is what I think you might be trying to realize, I would need your skills and maybe ChesterMiller to help evaluate it's potential (if any) :)
Thanks
RonL
 
Maylis said:
I know this will sound stupid, but what would happen if you just fed air into a turbine? Doesn't it derive energy from the rotation? Why do people run steam through a turbine? Sounds like a wind mill.
Clearly, people do run air through wind turbines...

They run water through hydroelectric turbines...

Steam turbines are different in that they are full thermodynamic cycles: heat is added on one side to carry energy via the phase change. Otherwise, you'd just have a water pump supplying a water turbine.
 
Maylis said:
Sounds like a wind mill.
It is.

When the wind hits the blades of a wind mill, it is loaded with energy, in this particular case, kinetic energy (½mv²). With the proper fan geometry, this energy is converted to pressure which rotates the fan.

The question is: If we don't have wind, how do we put energy in air standing still? The answer is often by heating up the air, like in a gas turbine. But you can replace the hot air by any other hot gas (like steam, for example) and it will work too.

Any gas turbine is of the internal combustion type, so the air entering the turbine is actually converted to exhaust gas before hitting the turbine's blades. But it works also with an external combustion, meaning only air is the medium within the turbine. But it is usually very difficult to heat air externally fast enough to create high level of power. Steam turbine is a kind of external combustion engine, but because the medium can change phase (liquid to gas), it gives some thermodynamics advantages over simply heating a gas.
 
jack action said:
The answer is often by heating up the air...
Like in a turbocharger, which also works with external * combustion... namely, an internal combustion engine's exhaust gas.

Wikipedia® said:
A turbocharger is powered by a turbine driven by the engine's exhaust gas.
* External combustion might not be, exactly, the right term... however, no combustion actually takes place
within the turbocharger, itself... it's all within the engine, or should be.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
It boils down to design and operating considerations. Think about designing a turbine with air as the working fluid versus steam/water (both operating in a cycle). Think about the volumes of materials that must be handled (outside the turbine), the size of the equipment, the heat transfer area required, the ease of pumping water vs air, etc.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K