Twice as many? 3/4 as many? How to interpret?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vay
  • Start date Start date
Vay
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How do you write "twice as many x as z" algebraically?

Is this 2x=z or x=2z? How do you know?

How about "3/4 as many x as z" algebraically?

Is this (3/4)x=z or z=(3/4)x? How do you know?

An applied example:
There are twice as many apples as there are oranges, so does this mean for each orange there are 2 apples, so that if apples=x and oranges=y, then y=2x; 2y=4x, and etc?

Are these statements ambiguous to you?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How do you write "twice as many x as z" algebraically?
Is this 2x=z or x=2z?

x = 2z

How do you know?

There's no trick to it; all of the information is right there in the expression. It says that you need 2 of z to equal 1 of x, hence: x = 2z.
 
Vay said:
How do you write "twice as many x as z" algebraically?

Is this 2x=z or x=2z? How do you know?
x = 2z

An equivalent problem is "x is twice as big as z." It might help to look at numbers. 50 is twice as big as 25. Would you write an equation expressing this relationship as
a) 50 = 2*25
or
b)2*50 = 25?
Vay said:
How about "3/4 as many x as z" algebraically?
x = (3/4)y
Vay said:
Is this (3/4)x=z or z=(3/4)x? How do you know?

An applied example:
There are twice as many apples as there are oranges, so does this mean for each orange there are 2 apples, so that if apples=x and oranges=y, then y=2x; 2y=4x, and etc?

Are these statements ambiguous to you?
I would not let apples = x and oranges = y. These variables should represent the number of apples or oranges.

As far as translating to equations, see what I said at the beginning of this post.
 
I don't know what has gotten to me, sometimes I just can't get something. It must be doing my math homework for 6 hours straight... I can't think straight anymore. Anyone else have similar experience? Or it must be something I ate...
 
Vay said:
How do you write "twice as many x as z" algebraically?

I usually try to think of this in terms of ratios. The phrase "twice as many x as z" gives you an equality of ratios, x:z is 2:1. Assuming z isn't zero, we can rewrite this using fractions as \frac{x}{z} = 2 so x = 2z.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top