Twice the Preceding Root Number: Proving a Conjecture

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tenshou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a conjecture that the number of imperfect roots between two consecutive perfect roots is always twice the preceding root number. Examples provided include two imperfect roots between √1 and √4, and six between √9 and √16, suggesting a consistent pattern. Participants explore the mathematical reasoning behind this conjecture, including the relationship between perfect squares and the integers between them. The conversation also touches on the possibility of generalizing this concept to n-th roots, acknowledging that while the pattern holds for square roots, it becomes more complex for higher roots. Overall, the conjecture appears to be a promising area for further mathematical exploration and proof.
Tenshou
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
I don't know if this is the proper thing to call it, but I haven't used any mathematical terminology in a while so I think I will try :P

The number of imperfect roots between any two consecutive perfect roots will always be twice the preceding root number.

for example there is 2 imperfect roots between ## \sqrt1 and \sqrt4## and 6 in between ##\sqrt9 and \sqrt16## This pattern seems to work I have tried this up for large numbers and it seems to hold, it seems like it should very easy to prove and I am working on this proof as we speak, but I think I could use a little help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: if n^2 is a perfect square, the next perfect square is (n+1)^2. How many integers (edit: better) are between those two numbers?
 
Last edited:
I don't understand the question mfb? there are countably infinite number, correct?

My question is strictly for natural number D:
 
I mean integers only, of course.
 
Well, then it would always be a odd number. unless you count the number you start on then it should be even every time?
 
How is 2 (as an example, the number of integers between 1 and 4) odd?
You can expand (n+1)^2 and get the number of integers between n^2 and (n+1)^2...
 
Sorry, I was counting like this 1...2*...3*...4*, I counted each element, like the distance >.< LOL! But you are right that is true, so it works for both squares and square roots, oh that is interesting, I should have checked that case... but now the real question is "Can I make a generalization for this for the n-th root of any "consecutive" numbers like##\sqrt[n]m## and ##\sqrt[n]k## are there n times the previous number where m and k are integers?" But I think you answered my question.
 
Tenshou said:
I don't know if this is the proper thing to call it, but I haven't used any mathematical terminology in a while so I think I will try :P

The number of imperfect roots between any two consecutive perfect roots will always be twice the preceding root number.

for example there is 2 imperfect roots between ## \sqrt1 and \sqrt4## and 6 in between ##\sqrt9 and \sqrt16## This pattern seems to work I have tried this up for large numbers and it seems to hold, it seems like it should very easy to prove and I am working on this proof as we speak, but I think I could use a little help...
Let ##n## be a positive integer. You are looking to see if ##2n+1 \stackrel{?}{=} (n+1)^2-n^2##.

$$2n+1 \stackrel{?}{=} (n+1)^2-n^2 \\ 2n+1 \stackrel{?}{=} ((n+1)-n)((n+1)+n) \\ 2n+1 = 2n+1$$

I don't understand your confusion.
 
Last edited:
Tenshou said:
but now the real question is "Can I make a generalization for this for the n-th root of any "consecutive" numbers like##\sqrt[n]m## and ##\sqrt[n]k## are there n times the previous number where m and k are integers?" But I think you answered my question.
Not n times the previous number, but you can get similar (just more complicated) formulas with the same approach as for the square root (n=2).
 
  • #10
So, they become more complicated than just n times the previous number? I mean it works for consecutive square roots of perfect squares, and it would be a little more complicated for consecutive cubes of perfect cubes and all the way forward, This is awesome!
 
  • #11
So, they become more complicated than just n times the previous number?
Just calculate some examples, and you'll see it.
 
  • #12
I did, and thanks, so I guess it busted that hypothesis lol
 
Back
Top