Twin Paradox: Question on the Effects of Speed and Gravity on Time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AaronTFoley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paradox Twin paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Twin Paradox illustrates the effects of speed and gravity on time as described by special and general relativity. In special relativity, time dilation occurs for the twin traveling at relativistic speeds, while general relativity accounts for gravitational effects on time. The Hafele-Keating experiment demonstrates the interplay between these two forms of time dilation, particularly in applications like GPS synchronization. Ultimately, the clock on Earth ticks more slowly than that on a spacecraft due to gravitational effects, complicating the straightforward conclusions of the Twin Paradox.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity and time dilation
  • Familiarity with general relativity and gravitational effects on time
  • Knowledge of the Hafele-Keating experiment
  • Basic principles of GPS technology and synchronization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Hafele-Keating experiment on modern technology
  • Study the differences between special and general relativity in detail
  • Explore the concept of gravitational time dilation in various contexts
  • Examine how GPS systems account for relativistic effects in real-time
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, engineers working on GPS technology, and anyone interested in the implications of speed and gravity on time perception.

AaronTFoley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question about the Twin Paradox. I don't know if I'm right or wrong, but that's why I figured I would come here to ask.

The way I understand things is that the twin on Earth's clock would end up being faster than the twin's clock out in deep space if the twin out in space was approaching the speed of light. Wouldn't the twin out in deep space be more massive due to traveling at the speed of light since as a object with mass approaches the speed of light it mass increases therefore never letting it exceed the speed of light? So if he is getting more massive, wouldn't he then be more effected by gravity and therefore his clock would speed up due to the gravitational force?

Like I said I don't know if these have already been stated, but it was something that made me think this morning.

Thanks for your time,
Aaron T Foley
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the twin paradox, we assume there's no gravity (like we assume spherical cows).

The twin paradox is a "standard scenario" in the theory of special relativity, which doesn't work when there's gravity.

The general theory of relativity is required when there's gravity, and it is within that theory that gravity affects time. But I haven't thought about what happens to the twin paradox within that theory.
 
Just a general consideration. In the general theory of relativity, clocks in a strong gravitational field tick more slowly. Considering the effect of the Earth's gravity, the clock on the Earth will tick more slowly than the spaceship clock, counteracting the "standard scenario" time dilation effect, as you intuited. It's not intuitively clear to me which of the many time dilation effects will win out.

One experiment which compared special and general relativistic time dilations was the Hafele-Keating experiment. Both time dilations are also taken into account in keeping GPS satellite clocks synchronized with those on earth. Apparently, "For a low Earth orbiter such as the Space Shuttle, the velocity is so great that slowing due to time dilation is the dominant effect, while for a GPS satellite clock, the gravitational blueshift is greater. (http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1/)"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K